Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜阑尾切除术中转开腹:危险因素和结局的队列分析。

Conversion-to-open in laparoscopic appendectomy: A cohort analysis of risk factors and outcomes.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E. 68th Street, New York, NY 10065, United States.

Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 402 East 67th Street, New York, NY 10065, United States.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:169-175. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.016. Epub 2017 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Identifying risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to open appendectomy could select patients who may benefit from primary open appendectomy. We aimed to develop a predictive scoring model for conversion from laparoscopic to open based on pre-operative patient characteristics.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the State Inpatient Database (2007-2011) was performed using derivation (N = 71,617) and validation (N = 143,235) cohorts of adults ≥ 18 years with acute appendicitis treated by laparoscopic-only (LA), conversion from laparoscopic to open (CA), or primary open (OA) appendectomy. Pre-operative variables independently associated with CA were identified and reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A weighted integer-based scoring model to predict CA was designed based on pre-operative variable ORs, and complications between operative subgroups were compared.

RESULTS

Independent predictors of CA in the derivation cohort were age ≥40 (OR 1.67; CI 1.55-1.80), male sex (OR 1.25; CI 1.17-1.34), black race (OR 1.46; CI 1.28-1.66), diabetes (OR 1.47; CI 1.31-1.65), obesity (OR 1.56; CI 1.40-1.74), and acute appendicitis with abscess or peritonitis (OR 7.00; CI 6.51-7.53). In the validation cohort, the CA predictive scoring model had an optimal cutoff score of 4 (range 0-9). The risk of conversion-to-open was ≤5% for a score <4, compared to 10-25% for a score ≥4. On composite outcomes analysis controlling for all pre-operative variables, CA had a higher likelihood of infectious/inflammatory (OR 1.44; CI 1.31-1.58), hematologic (OR 1.31; CI 1.17-1.46), and renal (OR 1.22; CI 1.06-1.39) complications compared to OA. Additionally, CA had a higher likelihood of infectious/inflammatory, respiratory, cardiovascular, hematologic, and renal complications compared to LA.

CONCLUSIONS

CA patients have an unfavorable complication profile compared to OA. The predictors identified in this scoring model could help select for patients who may benefit from primary open appendectomy.

摘要

背景

确定从腹腔镜转为开腹阑尾切除术的风险因素可以选择可能受益于初次开腹阑尾切除术的患者。我们旨在基于术前患者特征建立一种用于预测从腹腔镜转为开腹的评分模型。

方法

使用 2007 年至 2011 年的州住院患者数据库(N=71617)进行回顾性研究,其中包括通过腹腔镜仅治疗(LA)、从腹腔镜转为开腹(CA)或初次开腹(OA)阑尾切除术治疗的≥18 岁急性阑尾炎成人的推导(N=71617)和验证(N=143235)队列。确定与 CA 独立相关的术前变量,并以比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)报告。根据术前变量 OR 设计了一种加权整数基础评分模型,以预测 CA,并比较手术亚组之间的并发症。

结果

推导队列中 CA 的独立预测因子为年龄≥40 岁(OR 1.67;CI 1.55-1.80)、男性(OR 1.25;CI 1.17-1.34)、黑人(OR 1.46;CI 1.28-1.66)、糖尿病(OR 1.47;CI 1.31-1.65)、肥胖(OR 1.56;CI 1.40-1.74)和伴脓肿或腹膜炎的急性阑尾炎(OR 7.00;CI 6.51-7.53)。在验证队列中,CA 预测评分模型的最佳截断分数为 4(范围 0-9)。对于评分<4,转换为开腹的风险≤5%,而评分≥4 的风险为 10-25%。在控制所有术前变量的综合结局分析中,与 OA 相比,CA 更有可能发生感染/炎症(OR 1.44;CI 1.31-1.58)、血液(OR 1.31;CI 1.17-1.46)和肾脏(OR 1.22;CI 1.06-1.39)并发症。此外,与 OA 相比,CA 更有可能发生感染/炎症、呼吸、心血管、血液和肾脏并发症。

结论

与 OA 相比,CA 患者的并发症情况不佳。本评分模型中确定的预测因子可以帮助选择可能受益于初次开腹阑尾切除术的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验