• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

庆大霉素与阿米卡星——使用1000株临床分离株进行的体外比较

Gentamicin and amikacin---an in vitro comparison using 1000 clinical isolates.

作者信息

Forgan-Smith W R, McSweeney R J

出版信息

Aust N Z J Med. 1978 Aug;8(4):383-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1978.tb04906.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1445-5994.1978.tb04906.x
PMID:282852
Abstract

The in vitro antimicrobial activities of gentamicin and amikacin against 1000 bacterial isolates from clinical material were compared. The minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined by an agar dilution technique. Both of these aminoglycoside antibiotics had a similar spectrum of activity, being highly active against most species of aerobic Gram negative bacilli. Gentamicin was more active than amikacin against most species of enterobacteria, Haemophilus influenzae and Staphylococcus aureus but amikacin was more active against a proportion of Klebsiella and Providencia isolates. For most isolates, the differences in activity between gentamicin and amikacin were small, however, amikacin achieves higher serum levels. Most resistant isolates in this survey did not influence patient mortality.

摘要

比较了庆大霉素和阿米卡星对1000株临床分离菌的体外抗菌活性。采用琼脂稀释法测定最低抑菌浓度。这两种氨基糖苷类抗生素具有相似的活性谱,对大多数需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌具有高度活性。庆大霉素对大多数肠杆菌科细菌、流感嗜血杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌的活性比阿米卡星更强,但阿米卡星对部分克雷伯菌属和普罗威登斯菌属分离株的活性更强。对于大多数分离株,庆大霉素和阿米卡星之间的活性差异较小,然而,阿米卡星可达到更高的血清浓度。本次调查中大多数耐药分离株并未影响患者死亡率。

相似文献

1
Gentamicin and amikacin---an in vitro comparison using 1000 clinical isolates.庆大霉素与阿米卡星——使用1000株临床分离株进行的体外比较
Aust N Z J Med. 1978 Aug;8(4):383-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1978.tb04906.x.
2
Comparison of the in vitro activities of BB-K8 and three other aminoglycosides against 215 strains of Pseudomonas and Enterobacteriaceae with variable sensitivity to kanamycin and gentamicin.BB-K8与其他三种氨基糖苷类药物对215株对卡那霉素和庆大霉素敏感性各异的假单胞菌属和肠杆菌科细菌的体外活性比较。
Chemotherapy. 1975;21(1):45-51. doi: 10.1159/000221843.
3
Susceptibility of recently isolated bacteria to amikacin in vitro: comparisons with four other aminoglycoside antibiotics.近期分离出的细菌对阿米卡星的体外敏感性:与其他四种氨基糖苷类抗生素的比较。
J Infect Dis. 1976 Nov;134 SUPPL:S297-307. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.supplement_2.s297.
4
In vitro activity of netilmicin, gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin against glucose fermenting and nonfermenting bacteria.奈替米星、庆大霉素、妥布霉素和阿米卡星对葡萄糖发酵菌和非发酵菌的体外活性。
Chemotherapy. 1980;26(5):323-33. doi: 10.1159/000237924.
5
Bactericidal efficacy of Sch 20569 and amikacin against gentamicin-sensitive and -resistant organisms.Sch 20569和阿米卡星对庆大霉素敏感及耐药菌的杀菌效力
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Apr;9(4):595-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.4.595.
6
Fortimicin A: collaborative in vitro susceptibility. Comparison with amikacin and gentamicin against 11,840 clinical bacterial isolates.福提霉素A:体外协同药敏性。与阿米卡星和庆大霉素针对11840株临床分离菌的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Dec;16(6):823-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.16.6.823.
7
Gentamicin and tobramycin--an in vitro comparison using 1400 clinical isolates.庆大霉素与妥布霉素——使用1400株临床分离菌株的体外比较
Pathology. 1976 Jul;8(3):195-9. doi: 10.3109/00313027609058999.
8
In vitro susceptibility of clinically important bacteria to amikacin: correlation of results of broth dilution and disk sensitivity tests and effect of medium composition.临床重要细菌对阿米卡星的体外敏感性:肉汤稀释法和纸片药敏试验结果的相关性及培养基成分的影响
J Infect Dis. 1976 Nov;134 SUPPL:S262-70. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.supplement_2.s262.
9
In vitro susceptibility of gentamicin and/or tobramycin resistant gram-negative bacilli to seven aminoglycosides.庆大霉素和/或妥布霉素耐药革兰氏阴性杆菌对七种氨基糖苷类药物的体外敏感性
Infection. 1978;6(3):111-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01642258.
10
Amikacin, an aminoglycoside with marked activity against antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates.阿米卡星,一种对耐药临床分离株具有显著活性的氨基糖苷类抗生素。
J Infect Dis. 1976 Nov;134 SUPPL:S249-61. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.supplement_2.s249.