Carregal Ana Paula, Maciel Flávia V, Carregal Juliano B, Dos Reis Santos Bianca, da Silva Alisson Marques, Taranto Alex G
Universidade Federal de São João del Rei, Campus Centro-Oeste, Divinópolis, MG, Brazil.
Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, Campus Divinópolis, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
J Mol Model. 2017 Apr;23(4):111. doi: 10.1007/s00894-017-3253-8. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
The demand for new therapies has encouraged the development of faster and cheaper methods of drug design. Considering the number of potential biological targets for new drugs, the docking-based virtual screening (DBVS) approach has occupied a prominent role among modern strategies for identifying new bioactive substances. Some tools have been developed to validate docking methodologies and identify false positives, such as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. In this context, a database with 31 molecular targets called the Our Own Molecular Targets Data Bank (OOMT) was validated using the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) with two different docking methodologies: AutoDock Vina and DOCK 6. Sixteen molecular targets showed AUC values of >0.8, and those targets were selected for molecular docking studies. The drug-likeness properties were then determined for 473 Brazilian natural compounds that were obtained from the ZINC database. Ninety-six compounds showed similar drug-likeness property values to the marked drugs (positive values). These compounds were submitted to DBVS for 16 molecular targets. Our results showed that AutoDock Vina was more appropriate than DOCK 6 for performing DBVS experiments. Furthermore, this work suggests that three compounds-ZINC13513540, ZINC06041137, and ZINC1342926-are inhibitors of the three molecular targets 1AGW, 2ZOQ, and 3EYG, respectively, which are associated with cancer. Finally, since ZINC and the PDB were solely created to store biomolecule structures, their utilization requires the application of filters to improve the first steps of the drug development process. Graphical Abstract Evaluation of docking methods used for virtual screening.
对新疗法的需求推动了更快、更廉价药物设计方法的发展。考虑到新药潜在生物靶点的数量,基于对接的虚拟筛选(DBVS)方法在识别新生物活性物质的现代策略中占据了突出地位。已经开发了一些工具来验证对接方法并识别假阳性,例如接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线。在此背景下,使用均方根偏差(RMSD)和ROC曲线下面积(AUC),采用两种不同的对接方法:AutoDock Vina和DOCK 6,对一个包含31个分子靶点的数据库(称为我们自己的分子靶点数据库,即OOMT)进行了验证。16个分子靶点的AUC值大于0.8,这些靶点被选用于分子对接研究。然后确定了从ZINC数据库获得的473种巴西天然化合物的类药性质。96种化合物显示出与标记药物相似的类药性质值(正值)。这些化合物被提交用于针对16个分子靶点的DBVS。我们的结果表明,在进行DBVS实验时,AutoDock Vina比DOCK 6更合适。此外,这项工作表明,三种化合物——ZINC13513540、ZINC06041137和ZINC1342926——分别是与癌症相关的三种分子靶点1AGW、2ZOQ和3EYG的抑制剂。最后,由于ZINC和蛋白质数据银行(PDB)仅用于存储生物分子结构,它们的使用需要应用过滤器来改进药物开发过程的第一步。图形摘要用于虚拟筛选的对接方法评估。