Le Longfrie Surgery, Guernsey.
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Jun;29:28-32. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
With conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of manual therapy calls have arisen within some quarters of the physiotherapy profession challenging the continued use of manual skills for assessment and treatment. A reconceptualisation of the importance of manual examination findings is put forward, based upon a contemporary understanding of pain science, rather than considering these skills only in terms of how they should "guide" manual therapy interventions. The place for manual examination findings within complex, multidimensional presentations is considered using vignettes describing the presentations of five people with low back pain. As part of multidimensional, individualised management, the balance of evidence relating to the effectiveness, mechanisms of action and rationale for manual skills is discussed. It is concluded that if manual examination and therapeutic skills are used in a manner consistent with a contemporary understanding of pain science, multidimensional patient profiles and a person-centred approach, their selective and judicious use still has an important role.
关于手法治疗有效性的证据相互矛盾,这在物理治疗界的某些领域引起了争议,质疑继续使用手法技能进行评估和治疗的合理性。本文提出了对手法检查结果重要性的重新认识,这种认识是基于对疼痛科学的现代理解,而不是仅仅从它们应该如何“指导”手法治疗干预的角度来考虑这些技能。本文通过描述五名腰痛患者的表现来探讨手法检查结果在复杂多维表现中的位置。作为多维个体化管理的一部分,本文讨论了与手法技能的有效性、作用机制和原理相关的证据平衡。结论是,如果手法检查和治疗技能的使用符合疼痛科学的现代理解、多维患者特征和以人为中心的方法,那么它们的选择性和明智使用仍然具有重要作用。