Suppr超能文献

使用标准的风险筛查和评估表预防澳大利亚医院老年人受到伤害:一项混合方法研究。

Use of standard risk screening and assessment forms to prevent harm to older people in Australian hospitals: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research-Monash Health Partnership, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Sep;26(9):704-713. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005867. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard risk screening and assessment forms are frequently used in strategies to prevent harm to older people in hospitals. Little is known about good practices for their use.

OBJECTIVE

Scope the preventable harms addressed by standard forms used to screen and assess older people and how standard forms are operationalised in hospitals across Victoria, Australia.

METHODS

Mixed methods study: (1) cross-sectional audit of the standard risk screening and assessment forms used to assess older people at 11 health services in 2015; (2) nine focus groups with a purposive sample of 69 participants at 9 health services. Descriptive analysis examined the number of items on forms, preventable harms assessed and sources of duplication. Qualitative thematic analysis of focus group data identified themes explaining issues commonly affecting how health services used the forms.

RESULTS

152 standard assessment forms from 11 Victorian health services included over 3700 items with 17% duplicated across multiple forms. Assessments of skin integrity and mobility loss (including falls) were consistently included in forms; however, nutrition, cognitive state, pain and medication risks were inconsistent; and continence, venous thromboembolism risk and hospital acquired infection from invasive devices were infrequent. Qualitative analyses revealed five themes explaining issues associated with current use of assessment forms: (1) comprehensive assessment of preventable harms; (2) burden on staff and the older person, (3) interprofessional collaboration, (4) flexibility to individualise care and (5) information management. Examples of good practice were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Current use of standard risk screening and assessment forms is associated with a high burden and gaps in assessment of several common preventable harms that can increase risk to older people in hospital. Improvement should focus on streamlining forms, increased guidance on interventions to prevent harm and facilitating front-line staff to manage complex decisions.

摘要

背景

标准风险筛查和评估表常用于预防医院老年人伤害的策略中。但是,对于其使用的良好实践方法却知之甚少。

目的

确定用于筛查和评估老年人的标准表格所涉及的可预防伤害,并了解澳大利亚维多利亚州各医院如何实施这些标准表格。

方法

混合方法研究:(1)2015 年对 11 个卫生服务机构使用的标准风险筛查和评估表进行横断面审核;(2)在 9 个卫生服务机构中,对 69 名有目的抽样参与者进行了 9 个焦点小组讨论。描述性分析检查了表格上的项目数量、评估的可预防伤害以及重复的来源。对焦点小组数据的定性主题分析确定了解释常见影响卫生服务机构使用表格的问题的主题。

结果

11 个维多利亚州卫生服务机构的 152 份标准评估表包含超过 3700 个项目,其中 17%在多个表格中重复。表格中始终包含皮肤完整性和活动能力丧失(包括跌倒)的评估;然而,营养、认知状态、疼痛和药物风险的评估不一致;而失禁、静脉血栓栓塞风险和侵袭性器械引起的医院获得性感染则很少见。定性分析揭示了五个主题,解释了与当前评估表格使用相关的问题:(1)全面评估可预防的伤害;(2)工作人员和老年人的负担,(3)跨专业合作,(4)个性化护理的灵活性,(5)信息管理。还确定了一些良好实践的例子。

结论

当前使用标准风险筛查和评估表会给工作人员和老年人带来沉重负担,并且在评估一些常见的可预防伤害方面存在差距,这会增加医院老年人的风险。改进应侧重于简化表格、增加预防伤害的干预措施指南,并为一线工作人员提供便利,以处理复杂的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验