School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, Burwood, Vic., Australia.
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4936-4944. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13978. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Explore clinicians' perceptions of practice improvement strategies used to prevent harms to older people during acute hospitalisation.
Older people are vulnerable to many interrelated preventable harms during acute care hospitalisation. Improvement strategies recommend standardisation of practices to assist healthcare staff to mitigate risk; however, older people continue to suffer preventable harms in acute hospitals.
A qualitative exploratory descriptive design was used to collect data using focus groups and individual interviews from a purposive sample of 33 participants. Participants represented a wide range of clinicians from four diverse healthcare organisations. Qualitative content analysis used a framework informed by common preventable harms derived from key literature and policy documents.
Participants' perceptions of practice improvement strategies varied depending on their role within their organisational hierarchy. Recognition of preventable harms was guided by standard risk assessment and management tools used in their organisations. Preventable harms relating to skin integrity and falls were universally recognised across all sites and roles. Alternatively, there was variability in participant recognition of preventable harms related to nutrition, continence, medications and cognition; pain was consistently overlooked as a contributor to preventable harms.
Hospital staff perceived standard clinical risk assessment and management tools as the main practice improvement strategy to prevent harms. These tools prompted staff recognition of preventable harms to older people during acute hospitalisation. Variability in the recognition of some preventable harms was attributed to variable use of standard assessment tools. Pain was unlikely to be recognised as contributing to preventable harms.
Clinical Risk Management tools may assist clinicians in recognising and responding to preventable harms to older people during hospitalisation. These tools provide critical resources for consistent and timely assessment and evaluation of risk for preventable harms.
探讨临床医生对用于预防老年人在急性住院期间受到伤害的实践改进策略的看法。
老年人在急性护理住院期间易受到许多相互关联的可预防伤害。改进策略建议标准化实践,以帮助医护人员降低风险;然而,老年人在急性医院仍遭受可预防的伤害。
采用定性探索性描述设计,使用焦点小组和个人访谈从四个不同医疗保健组织的目的样本中收集数据,共有 33 名参与者。参与者代表了来自广泛临床医生群体。定性内容分析使用了一种框架,该框架基于关键文献和政策文件中得出的常见可预防伤害。
参与者对实践改进策略的看法因他们在组织层次结构中的角色而异。可预防伤害的认识受其组织中使用的标准风险评估和管理工具的指导。与皮肤完整性和跌倒相关的可预防伤害在所有地点和角色中都得到普遍认识。相反,与营养、失禁、药物和认知相关的可预防伤害的认识存在差异;疼痛一直被忽视为可预防伤害的一个因素。
医院工作人员将标准临床风险评估和管理工具视为预防伤害的主要实践改进策略。这些工具促使工作人员认识到老年人在急性住院期间的可预防伤害。一些可预防伤害的识别存在差异归因于标准评估工具的使用情况不同。疼痛不太可能被认为是可预防伤害的原因。
临床风险管理工具可以帮助临床医生在住院期间识别和应对老年人的可预防伤害。这些工具为持续和及时评估和评估可预防伤害的风险提供了关键资源。