Department of Radiology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea.
Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University, 20 Geonji-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Chonbuk, 54907, Korea.
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4120-4128. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4781-4. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
To compare spin-echo echoplanar imaging (SE-EPI) and gradient recalled echo (GRE) MR elastography (MRE) at 3 T with and without gadoxetic acid administration.
We included 84 patients who underwent MRE before and after gadoxetic acid administration, each time using SE-EPI and GRE sequences. Diagnostic performance for predicting clinical liver cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). The relationships between T2* and success of MRE, and correlations of liver stiffness (LS) values between the two sequences or before and after gadoxetic acid administration, were investigated.
SE-EPI-MRE resulted in a significantly lower failure rate than GRE-MRE (1.19% vs. 10.71%, P = 0.018). Increased T2* was related to higher probability of successful LS measurement (odds ratio, 1.426; P = 0.004). The AUC of SE-EPI-MRE was comparable to that of GRE-MRE for the detection of clinical liver cirrhosis (0.938 vs. 0.948, P = 0.235) and high-risk oesophageal varices (0.839 vs. 0.752, P = 0.354). LS values were not significantly different before and after gadoxetic acid administration.
SE-EPI-MRE can substitute for GRE-MRE for the detection of clinical liver cirrhosis and high-risk oesophageal varices. SE-EPI-MRE is particularly useful in patients with iron deposition, with lower failure rates than GRE-MRE.
• LS values are comparable between SE-EPI-MRE and GRE-MRE. • Administration of gadoxetic acid does not influence LS measurement. • The failure rate of SE-EPI-MRE is significantly lower than that of GRE-MRE.
比较 3T 磁共振弹性成像(MRE)自旋回波平面回波成像(SE-EPI)和梯度回波(GRE)序列,以及是否联合钆塞酸二钠增强检查。
本研究共纳入 84 例患者,分别行 SE-EPI 和 GRE 序列 MRE 检查,检查前后均行钆塞酸二钠增强检查。应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)评估 SE-EPI-MRE 和 GRE-MRE 对临床肝硬化和高危食管静脉曲张的诊断效能。分析 T2*值与 MRE 成功率的关系,比较两种序列或增强前后 LS 值之间的相关性。
SE-EPI-MRE 序列的失败率显著低于 GRE-MRE 序列(1.19%比 10.71%,P=0.018)。T2*值增加与 LS 测量成功率增加显著相关(比值比,1.426;P=0.004)。SE-EPI-MRE 对临床肝硬化(AUC:0.938 比 0.948,P=0.235)和高危食管静脉曲张(AUC:0.839 比 0.752,P=0.354)的诊断效能与 GRE-MRE 相当。SE-EPI-MRE 和 GRE-MRE 测量的 LS 值在增强前后无显著差异。
SE-EPI-MRE 可以替代 GRE-MRE 用于检测临床肝硬化和高危食管静脉曲张,且对于铁沉积患者具有更低的失败率。
• SE-EPI-MRE 和 GRE-MRE 的 LS 值相当。• 钆塞酸二钠增强检查不影响 LS 值测量。• SE-EPI-MRE 的失败率显著低于 GRE-MRE。