• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Use of patient decision aids increased younger women's reluctance to begin screening mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用患者决策辅助工具增加了年轻女性开始进行乳腺钼靶筛查的顾虑:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4027-9. Epub 2017 Mar 13.
2
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8(3):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2.
3
Assessment of the effects of decision aids about breast cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具效果评估:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e016894. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016894.
4
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
5
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
6
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
7
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
8
Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.关于进行筛查测试的明智决策的个性化风险沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18(4):CD001865. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001865.pub2.
9
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Online Interactive Decision Tools on Women's Decision-Making Regarding Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线交互式决策工具对女性乳腺癌筛查决策的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 29;27:e65974. doi: 10.2196/65974.
2
Acceptability of de-intensified screening for women at low risk of breast cancer: a randomised online experimental survey.接受度降低的乳腺癌低危女性筛查:一项随机在线实验调查。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):1111. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12847-w.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Cancer-Screening Decision Making: An Overview of Reviews.癌症筛查决策辅助工具的比较效果:综述概述
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Dec;39(16):3299-3314. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09001-4. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
4
Would shared decision-making be useful in breast cancer screening programmes? A qualitative study using focus group discussions to gather evidence from French women with different socioeconomic backgrounds.在乳腺癌筛查项目中,共同决策是否有用?一项使用焦点小组讨论从具有不同社会经济背景的法国女性中收集证据的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 7;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17876-5.
5
Mammography and Decision Aid Use for Breast Cancer Screening in Older Women.乳腺 X 线摄影术和决策辅助工具在老年女性乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Oct;63(4):630-635. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.014. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
6
Perceptions of Conflicting Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations Among Racially/Ethnically Diverse Women: a Multimethod Study.不同种族/族裔背景女性对相互冲突的乳腺癌筛查建议的看法:一项多方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(5):1145-1154. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07336-w. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
7
Effect of an information leaflet on breast cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.信息单页对乳腺癌筛查参与的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 3;21(1):1301. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11360-0.
8
Informing Women About Overdetection in Breast Cancer Screening: Two-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial.在乳腺癌筛查中告知女性过度检测:一项随机试验的两年结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1523-1530. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djab083.
9
Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于网络的癌症临床决策辅助工具:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Nov;29(11):6929-6941. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06184-y. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
10
Use of an Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care Practices.在线乳腺癌风险评估和患者决策辅助工具在初级保健实践中的应用。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Jun;29(6):763-769. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8143. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer Screening in Denmark: A Cohort Study of Tumor Size and Overdiagnosis.丹麦的乳腺癌筛查:一项关于肿瘤大小和过度诊断的队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Mar 7;166(5):313-323. doi: 10.7326/M16-0270. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
2
Psychological predictors of participation in screening for cognitive impairment among community-dwelling older adults.社区居住的老年人认知障碍筛查参与的心理预测因素。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2017 Aug;17(8):1197-1204. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12841. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
3
Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.乳腺癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):279-96. doi: 10.7326/M15-2886. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
4
Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.数字化乳腺钼靶筛查假阳性和假阴性结果发生率的相关因素:登记数据的分析
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):226-35. doi: 10.7326/M15-0971. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.乳腺癌筛查的危害:系统评价更新 2009 年美国预防服务工作组建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67. doi: 10.7326/M15-0970. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
6
Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.乳腺癌筛查的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析以更新 2009 年美国预防服务工作组的建议。
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Impact of a decision aid on reducing uncertainty: pilot study of women in their 40s and screening mammography.决策辅助工具对减少不确定性的影响:针对40多岁女性及乳腺钼靶筛查的试点研究
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Nov 10;15:89. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0210-2.
8
Mammography screening in less developed countries.欠发达国家的乳腺钼靶筛查。
Springerplus. 2015 Oct 15;4:615. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1394-8. eCollection 2015.
9
Breast Cancer Screening for Women at Average Risk: 2015 Guideline Update From the American Cancer Society.平均风险女性的乳腺癌筛查:美国癌症协会2015年指南更新
JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1599-614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783.
10
Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening.乳腺钼靶检查决策辅助工具可减少四十多岁考虑进行筛查的女性的决策冲突。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Dec;24(12):1013-20. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5256. Epub 2015 Sep 11.

使用患者决策辅助工具增加了年轻女性开始进行乳腺钼靶筛查的顾虑:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Use of patient decision aids increased younger women's reluctance to begin screening mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Ivlev Ilya, Hickman Erin N, McDonagh Marian S, Eden Karen B

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Pacific Northwest Evidence-based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics & Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul;32(7):803-812. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4027-9. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-017-4027-9
PMID:28289963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5481237/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As breast cancer screening guidelines have changed recently, additional investigation is needed to understand changes in women's behavior after using breast cancer screening patient decision aids (BCS-PtDAs) and the potential effect on mammography utilization. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to evaluate the effect of BCS-PtDAs on changes in women's intentions to undergo screening mammography and whether women deciding to begin or discontinue screening mammography displayed similar changes in screening intentions after using a BCS-PtDA.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Scopus, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Health and Psychosocial Instruments, Health Technology Assessment Database, PsycARTICLES, and cited references in eligible papers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies, published through August 24, 2016. The proportions of women who did and not intend to undergo screening and who were uncertain about undergoing screening mammography were pooled, using risk ratios (RR) and random effects. According to the protocol, RCTs or observational studies and any language were considered eligible for systematic review if they included data about women for which shared decision making is recommended.

RESULTS

We ultimately included six studies with screening intention data for 2040 women. Compared to usual care, the use of BCS-PtDAs in three RCTs resulted in significantly more women deciding not to undergo screening mammography (RR 1.48 [95% CI 1.04-2.13]; P = 0.03), particularly for younger (38-50 years) women (1.77 [1.34-2.34]; P < 0.001). The use of BCS-PtDAs had a non-significant effect on the intentions of older women (69-89 years) to discontinue screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BCS-PtDAs increased younger women's reluctance to undergo screening for breast cancer. The implementation of such BCS-PtDAs in clinical practice would be expected to result in a 77% increase in the number of younger women (aged 38-50) who do not intend to be screened, and as a consequence, may reduce utilization of screening mammography.

REGISTRATION

The protocol of this review is registered in the PROSPERO database, #CRD42016036695.

摘要

背景

由于乳腺癌筛查指南最近发生了变化,需要进行更多调查,以了解女性在使用乳腺癌筛查患者决策辅助工具(BCS-PtDAs)后的行为变化以及对乳房X线摄影利用率的潜在影响。这项系统评价和荟萃分析旨在评估BCS-PtDAs对女性接受乳房X线筛查意愿变化的影响,以及决定开始或停止乳房X线筛查的女性在使用BCS-PtDA后筛查意愿是否有类似变化。

方法

我们检索了Medline、Scopus、PsycINFO、CENTRAL、健康与心理社会测量工具、卫生技术评估数据库、PsycARTICLES以及符合条件论文中的参考文献,以查找截至2016年8月24日发表的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究。使用风险比(RR)和随机效应,汇总了打算和不打算接受筛查以及对接受乳房X线筛查不确定的女性比例。根据方案,如果RCT或观察性研究包含有关建议共同决策的女性的数据,则无论语言如何,均被视为符合系统评价的条件。

结果

我们最终纳入了六项研究,这些研究提供了2040名女性的筛查意愿数据。与常规护理相比,三项RCT中使用BCS-PtDAs导致更多女性决定不接受乳房X线筛查(RR 1.48 [95% CI 1.04 - 2.13];P = 0.03),特别是对于年龄较小(38 - 50岁)的女性(1.77 [1.34 - 2.34];P < 0.001)。使用BCS-PtDAs对老年女性(69 - 89岁)停止筛查的意愿没有显著影响。

结论

使用BCS-PtDAs增加了年轻女性对乳腺癌筛查的抵触情绪。在临床实践中实施此类BCS-PtDAs预计将导致不打算接受筛查的年轻女性(38 - 50岁)数量增加77%,因此可能会降低乳房X线筛查的利用率。

注册

本评价方案已在PROSPERO数据库中注册,#CRD42016036695。