Cai Suping, Peng Yanlin, Chong Tao, Zhang Yun, von Deneen Karen M, Huang Liyu
School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710071. China.
School of Life Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710071. China.
Curr Alzheimer Res. 2017;14(9):937-950. doi: 10.2174/1567205014666170309120200.
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is often a transitional state between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD). When observed longitudinally, some MCI patients convert to AD, while a considerable portion either remains MCI or revert to a normal functioning state. This divergence has provided some enlightenment on a potential biomarker to be represented in the resting state brain activities of MCI patients with different post-hoc labels. Recent studies have shown impaired executive functions, other than typically explicated memory impairment with AD/MCI patients. This observation raises the question that whether or not the executive control network (ECN) was impaired, which pivotally supports the central executive functions. Given the fact that effective connectivity is a sufficient index in detecting resting brain abnormalities in AD/MCI, the current study specifically asks a question whether the effective connectivity patterns are differentiated in MCI patients with different post-hoc labels.
We divided the MCI subjects into three groups depending on their progressive state obtained longitudinally: 1) 15 MCI-R subjects: MCI reverted to the normal functioning state and stabilized to the normal state in 24 months; 2) 35 MCI-S subjects: MCI patients maintained this disease in a stable state for 24 months; 3) 22 MCI-P subjects: MCI progressed to AD and stabilized to AD in 24 months, and 4) 39 age-matched normal control subjects (NC). We conducted a Granger causality analysis after identifying the core nodes of ECN in all of the subjects using Independent Component Analysis. Our findings revealed that different MCI groups presented different effective connectivity patterns within the ECN compared to the NC group. Specifically, (1) dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dLPFC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) were the core nodes in the ECN network that exhibited different connecting patterns; (2) an effective connection circuit "R.dLPFC→ right caudate→ left thalamus→R.dLPFC" in the ECN showed different levels of damage; and (3) there were four pathways between the R.dLPFC and L.LP, and these four pathways were also different.
Our results would help to understand the potential central mechanism of MCI patients. The differentiated effective connectivity of ECN may serve as a potential biomarker for early detection of AD, which may also provide a reference for clinical researchers to manipulate active but distinctive interventions for MCI patients who have different risks.
轻度认知障碍(MCI)通常是正常衰老与阿尔茨海默病(AD)之间的过渡状态。纵向观察时,一些MCI患者会转变为AD,而相当一部分患者要么仍处于MCI状态,要么恢复到正常功能状态。这种差异为在具有不同事后标签的MCI患者静息态脑活动中寻找潜在生物标志物提供了一些启示。最近的研究表明,除了AD/MCI患者典型的记忆障碍外,其执行功能也受损。这一观察结果提出了一个问题,即关键支持中央执行功能的执行控制网络(ECN)是否受损。鉴于有效连接性是检测AD/MCI静息脑异常的一个充分指标,本研究特别提出一个问题,即不同事后标签的MCI患者的有效连接模式是否存在差异。
我们根据纵向获得的进展状态将MCI受试者分为三组:1)15名MCI-R受试者:MCI恢复到正常功能状态,并在24个月内稳定至正常状态;2)35名MCI-S受试者:MCI患者在24个月内维持该疾病稳定状态;3)22名MCI-P受试者:MCI进展为AD,并在24个月内稳定至AD状态;4)39名年龄匹配的正常对照受试者(NC)。我们在使用独立成分分析确定所有受试者ECN的核心节点后进行了格兰杰因果分析。我们的研究结果显示,与NC组相比,不同的MCI组在ECN内呈现出不同的有效连接模式。具体而言,(1)背外侧前额叶皮质(dLPFC)和内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)是ECN网络中表现出不同连接模式的核心节点;(2)ECN中的一个有效连接回路“右背外侧前额叶皮质→右尾状核→左丘脑→右背外侧前额叶皮质”显示出不同程度的损伤;(3)右背外侧前额叶皮质和左外侧前额叶之间有四条通路,这四条通路也各不相同。
我们的结果将有助于理解MCI患者的潜在中枢机制。ECN的差异化有效连接可能作为早期检测AD的潜在生物标志物,这也可能为临床研究人员针对具有不同风险的MCI患者采取积极但独特的干预措施提供参考。