Kozij Natalie K, Granton John T, Silkoff Philip E, Thenganatt John, Chakravorty Shobha, Johnson Sindhu R
University Health Network Pulmonary Hypertension Programme, Toronto General Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Can Respir J. 2017;2017:6736239. doi: 10.1155/2017/6736239. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
. Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) is a potential biomarker to distinguish systemic sclerosis (SSc) associated pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). We evaluated the discriminative validity, feasibility, methods of eNO measurement, and magnitude of differences across lung diseases, disease-subsets (SSc, systemic lupus erythematosus), and healthy-controls. . Consecutive subjects in the UHN Pulmonary Hypertension Programme were recruited. Exhaled nitric oxide was measured at 50 mL/s intervals using chemiluminescent detection. Alveolar and conducting airway NO were partitioned using a two-compartment model of axial diffusion (CMAD) and the trumpet model of axial diffusion (TMAD). . Sixty subjects were evaluated. Using the CMAD model, control subjects had lower median (IQR) alveolar NO than all PAH subjects (2.0 (1.5, 2.5) versus 3.14 ppb (2.3, 4.0), = 0.008). SSc-ILD had significantly lower median conducting airway NO compared to controls (1009.5 versus 1342.1 ml⁎ppb/s, = 0.04). SSc-PAH had increased median (IQR) alveolar NO compared to controls (3.3 (3.0, 5.7) versus 2.0 ppb (1.5, 2.5), = 0.01). SSc-PAH conducting airway NO inversely correlated with DLCO ( -0.88 (95% CI -0.99, -0.26)). . We have demonstrated feasibility, identified that CMAD modeling is preferred in SSc, and reported the magnitude of differences across cases and controls. Our data supports discriminative validity of eNO in SSc lung disease.
呼出一氧化氮(eNO)是区分系统性硬化症(SSc)相关肺动脉高压(PAH)和间质性肺疾病(ILD)的一种潜在生物标志物。我们评估了eNO测量的判别效度、可行性、方法以及不同肺部疾病、疾病亚组(SSc、系统性红斑狼疮)和健康对照之间的差异程度。
招募了多伦多大学健康网络肺动脉高压项目中的连续受试者。使用化学发光检测法以50 mL/s的间隔测量呼出一氧化氮。采用轴向扩散两室模型(CMAD)和轴向扩散喇叭模型(TMAD)对肺泡和传导气道一氧化氮进行划分。
对60名受试者进行了评估。使用CMAD模型,对照受试者的肺泡一氧化氮中位数(IQR)低于所有PAH受试者(2.0(1.5,2.5)对3.14 ppb(2.3,4.0),P = 0.008)。与对照相比,SSc-ILD的传导气道一氧化氮中位数显著降低(1009.5对1342.1 ml⁎ppb/s,P = 0.04)。与对照相比,SSc-PAH的肺泡一氧化氮中位数(IQR)升高(3.3(3.0,5.7)对2.0 ppb(1.5,2.5),P = 0.01)。SSc-PAH的传导气道一氧化氮与一氧化碳弥散量(DLCO)呈负相关(r = -0.88(95%CI -0.99,-0.26))。
我们已经证明了可行性,确定在SSc中CMAD建模更可取,并报告了病例与对照之间的差异程度。我们的数据支持eNO在SSc肺部疾病中的判别效度。