Woo Shoshana L, Kung Theodore A, Brown David L, Leonard James A, Kelly Brian M, Cederna Paul S
Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Dec 27;4(12):e1038. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001038. eCollection 2016 Dec.
Originally designed for prosthetic control, regenerative peripheral nerve interfaces (RPNIs) prevent neuroma formation by providing free muscle grafts as physiological targets for peripheral nerve ingrowth. We report the first series of patients undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic postamputation neuromas.
A retrospective case series of all amputees undergoing RPNI implantation for treatment of symptomatic neuromas between November 2013 and June 2015 is presented. Data were obtained via chart review and phone interviews using questions derived from the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments. Statistical analyses were performed using dependent sample tests with a significance threshold of < 0.01.
Forty-six RPNIs were implanted into 16 amputees for neuroma relief (3 upper extremities and 14 lower extremities). Mean age was 53.5 years (6 females and 10 males). All patients participated in postoperative phone interviews at 7.5 ± 3.4 (range: 3-15) months. Patients reported a 71% reduction in neuroma pain and a 53% reduction in phantom pain. Most patients felt satisfied or highly satisfied with RPNI surgery (75%), reporting decreased (56%) or stable (44%) levels of analgesic use. Most patients would strongly recommend RPNI surgery to a friend (88%) and would do it again if given the option (94%). Complications included delayed wound healing ( = 4) and neuroma pain at a different site ( = 2).
RPNI implantation carries a reasonable complication profile while offering a simple, effective treatment for symptomatic neuromas. Most patients report a significant reduction in neuroma and phantom pain with a high level of satisfaction. The physiological basis for preventing neuroma recurrence is an intriguing benefit to this approach.
再生周围神经接口(RPNIs)最初设计用于假肢控制,通过提供游离肌肉移植物作为周围神经向内生长的生理靶点来预防神经瘤形成。我们报告了首例接受RPNI植入治疗有症状截肢后神经瘤的患者系列。
呈现了2013年11月至2015年6月期间所有接受RPNI植入治疗有症状神经瘤的截肢患者的回顾性病例系列。数据通过病历审查和电话访谈获得,使用来自患者报告结局测量信息系统工具的问题。采用相关样本检验进行统计分析,显著性阈值设定为<0.01。
为16名截肢患者植入了46个RPNIs以缓解神经瘤(3例上肢和14例下肢)。平均年龄为53.5岁(6名女性和10名男性)。所有患者在术后7.5±3.4(范围:3 - 15)个月时参与了电话访谈。患者报告神经瘤疼痛减轻了71%,幻肢痛减轻了53%。大多数患者对RPNI手术感到满意或非常满意(75%),报告镇痛药物使用量减少(56%)或稳定(44%)。大多数患者会强烈向朋友推荐RPNI手术(88%),并且如果有选择的话会再次接受手术(94%)。并发症包括伤口愈合延迟(n = 4)和不同部位的神经瘤疼痛(n = 2)。
RPNI植入具有合理的并发症情况,同时为有症状的神经瘤提供了一种简单、有效的治疗方法。大多数患者报告神经瘤和幻肢痛显著减轻,满意度较高。预防神经瘤复发的生理基础是这种方法的一个有趣益处。