Dhikav Vikas, Duraiswamy Sharmila, Anand Kuljeet Singh
Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2017 Jan-Mar;20(1):29-35. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.199903.
Hippocampus undergoes atrophy in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Calculation of hippocampal volumes can be done by a variety of methods using T1-weighted images of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Medial temporal lobes atrophy (MTL) can be rated visually using T1-weighted MRI brain images. The present study was done to see if any correlation existed between hippocampal volumes and visual rating scores of the MTL using Scheltens Visual Rating Method.
We screened 84 subjects presented to the Department of Neurology of a Tertiary Care Hospital and enrolled forty subjects meeting the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, AD related Disease Association criteria. Selected patients underwent MRI brain and T1-weighted images in a plane perpendicular to long axis of hippocampus were obtained. Hippocampal volumes were calculated manually using a standard protocol. The calculated hippocampal volumes were correlated with Scheltens Visual Rating Method for Rating MTL. A total of 32 cognitively normal age-matched subjects were selected to see the same correlation in the healthy subjects as well. Sensitivity and specificity of both methods was calculated and compared.
There was an insignificant correlation between the hippocampal volumes and MTL rating scores in cognitively normal elderly ( = 32; Pearson Correlation coefficient = 0.16, > 0.05). In the AD Group, there was a moderately strong correlation between measured hippocampal volumes and MTL Rating (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -0.54; < 0.05. There was a moderately strong correlation between hippocampal volume and Mini-Mental Status Examination in the AD group. Manual delineation was superior compared to the visual method ( < 0.05).
Good correlation was present between manual hippocampal volume measurements and MTL scores. Sensitivity and specificity of manual measurement of hippocampus was higher compared to visual rating scores for MTL in patients with AD.
阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的海马体会发生萎缩。可以使用多种方法通过脑部磁共振成像(MRI)的T1加权图像来计算海马体体积。内侧颞叶萎缩(MTL)可以通过T1加权MRI脑部图像进行视觉评分。本研究旨在使用Scheltens视觉评分法,观察海马体体积与MTL视觉评分之间是否存在任何相关性。
我们对一家三级护理医院神经内科的84名受试者进行了筛查,招募了40名符合美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所、AD相关疾病协会标准的受试者。选定的患者接受了脑部MRI检查,并获取了垂直于海马体长轴平面的T1加权图像。使用标准方案手动计算海马体体积。将计算出的海马体体积与用于MTL评分的Scheltens视觉评分法进行相关性分析。还选择了32名年龄匹配的认知正常受试者,以观察健康受试者中是否存在相同的相关性。计算并比较了两种方法的敏感性和特异性。
在认知正常的老年人中(n = 32;Pearson相关系数 = 0.16,P > 0.05),海马体体积与MTL评分之间存在不显著的相关性。在AD组中,测量的海马体体积与MTL评分之间存在中度强相关性(Pearson相关系数 = -0.54;P < 0.05)。AD组中海马体体积与简易精神状态检查表之间存在中度强相关性。与视觉方法相比,手动勾勒更具优势(P < 0.05)。
手动测量海马体体积与MTL评分之间存在良好的相关性。在AD患者中,与MTL视觉评分相比,手动测量海马体的敏感性和特异性更高。