• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种异鼠科啮齿动物的微生境选择

Microhabitat selection in two species of heteromyid rodents.

作者信息

Lemen Cliff A, Rosenzweig Michael L

机构信息

Biology Department, University of New Mexico, 87131, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, 85721, Tuscon, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(2):127-135. doi: 10.1007/BF00344843.

DOI:10.1007/BF00344843
PMID:28309159
Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine the microhabitat preferences of two heteromyid rodents, Dipodomys ordi and Perognathus flavus. This experiment used marked seeds and the atomic absorption spectrophotometer in order to study the environment as a mosiac of microhabitats. The results of our analysis indicate that these two heteromyids are microhabitat selectors. The preferences of the rodents are D. ordi: grass habitat 0.0%, near grass habitat 22.5%, open habitat 77.4% and P. flavus: grass habitat 46.2%, near grass habitat 32.2%, open habitat 21.4%. The overlap between the two species is only 0.43.

摘要

进行了一项实验,以确定两种异鼠科啮齿动物(奥氏更格卢鼠和金黄更格卢鼠)对微生境的偏好。该实验使用了有标记的种子和原子吸收分光光度计,以便将环境作为微生境的镶嵌体来研究。我们的分析结果表明,这两种异鼠科动物是微生境选择者。啮齿动物的偏好为:奥氏更格卢鼠:草地生境0.0%,近草地生境22.5%,开阔生境77.4%;金黄更格卢鼠:草地生境46.2%,近草地生境32.2%,开阔生境21.4%。这两个物种之间的重叠率仅为0.43。

相似文献

1
Microhabitat selection in two species of heteromyid rodents.两种异鼠科啮齿动物的微生境选择
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(2):127-135. doi: 10.1007/BF00344843.
2
Competitive release in microhabitat use among coexisting desert rodents: a natural experiment.共存沙漠啮齿动物微生境利用中的竞争释放:一项自然实验
Oecologia. 1986 May;69(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/BF00377627.
3
Microhabitat use in coexisting desert rodents-The role of population density.共存沙漠啮齿动物的微生境利用——种群密度的作用。
Oecologia. 1981 Sep;50(3):310-315. doi: 10.1007/BF00344968.
4
The effects of owl predation on the foraging behavior of heteromyid rodents.猫头鹰捕食对异鼠科啮齿动物觅食行为的影响。
Oecologia. 1988 Aug;76(3):408-415. doi: 10.1007/BF00377036.
5
Effects of body size, seed density, and soil characteristics on rates of seed harvest by heteromyid rodents.体型、种子密度和土壤特性对更格卢鼠科啮齿动物种子收获率的影响。
Oecologia. 1984 Mar;61(3):420-425. doi: 10.1007/BF00379646.
6
Cheek pouch capacities and loading rates of heteromyid rodents.更格卢鼠科啮齿动物的颊囊容量和装填率。
Oecologia. 1997 Dec;113(1):21-28. doi: 10.1007/s004420050349.
7
A mechanism for resource allocation among sympatric heteromyid rodent species.同域异鼠科啮齿动物物种间资源分配的一种机制。
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(1):115-126. doi: 10.1007/BF00377000.
8
Mechanisms of seed harvest by heteromyid rodents: soil texture effects on harvest rate and seed size selection.异鼠科啮齿动物收获种子的机制:土壤质地对收获率和种子大小选择的影响
Oecologia. 1989 Oct;81(2):267-273. doi: 10.1007/BF00379814.
9
Seedling-aided cache detection by heteromyid rodents.异鼠科啮齿动物借助幼苗辅助进行贮藏物检测。
Oecologia. 2000 Jan;122(1):66-71. doi: 10.1007/PL00008837.
10
Granivory and microhabitat use in Australian desert rodents: are seeds important?澳大利亚荒漠啮齿动物的食谷习性与微生境利用:种子很重要吗?
Oecologia. 1994 Sep;99(3-4):216-225. doi: 10.1007/BF00627733.

引用本文的文献

1
Rodents' responses to manipulated plant litter and seed densities: implications for restoration.啮齿动物对经人工处理的植物凋落物和种子密度的反应:对恢复的影响
PeerJ. 2020 Jul 6;8:e9465. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9465. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparing Plasticity of Response to Perceived Risk in the Textbook Example of Convergent Evolution of Desert Rodents and Their Predators; a Manipulative Study Employing the Landscape of Fear.在沙漠啮齿动物及其捕食者趋同进化的教科书示例中比较对感知风险反应的可塑性;一项采用恐惧景观的操纵性研究
Front Behav Neurosci. 2019 Mar 22;13:58. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00058. eCollection 2019.
3
Divergent behavior amid convergent evolution: A case of four desert rodents learning to respond to known and novel vipers.

本文引用的文献

1
Seed size selection in heteromyids : A second look.异鼠科动物的种子大小选择:再审视
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;35(1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00345538.
2
Perturbation analysis of competition and overlap in habitat utilization between Dipodomys ordii and Dipodomys merriami.奥氏更格卢鼠和梅氏更格卢鼠在栖息地利用方面的竞争与重叠的扰动分析
Oecologia. 1975 Mar;19(1):9-28. doi: 10.1007/BF00377586.
趋同进化中的分歧行为:四种沙漠啮齿动物学习应对已知和新型毒蛇的案例。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 20;13(8):e0200672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200672. eCollection 2018.
4
Granivory and microhabitat use in Australian desert rodents: are seeds important?澳大利亚荒漠啮齿动物的食谷习性与微生境利用:种子很重要吗?
Oecologia. 1994 Sep;99(3-4):216-225. doi: 10.1007/BF00627733.
5
Spatial organization of a desert rodent community: food addition and species removal.沙漠啮齿动物群落的空间组织:食物添加与物种移除
Oecologia. 1987 Apr;72(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/BF00385048.
6
Habitat structure and predators: choices and consequences for rodent habitat specialists and generalists.栖息地结构与捕食者:啮齿动物栖息地专性物种和广性物种面临的选择及其后果
Oecologia. 1987 Apr;72(1):39-45. doi: 10.1007/BF00385042.
7
Competitive release in microhabitat use among coexisting desert rodents: a natural experiment.共存沙漠啮齿动物微生境利用中的竞争释放:一项自然实验
Oecologia. 1986 May;69(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/BF00377627.
8
Effects of seed distribution and competitors on seed harvesting efficiency in heteromyid rodents.种子分布和竞争者对异鼠科啮齿动物种子收获效率的影响。
Oecologia. 1979 Jan;44(3):342-346. doi: 10.1007/BF00545238.
9
Ecological consequences of body size: a model for patch choice in desert rodents.体型的生态后果:沙漠啮齿动物斑块选择模型
Oecologia. 1983 Sep;59(2-3):384-392. doi: 10.1007/BF00378866.
10
Seed size selection in heteromyids : A second look.异鼠科动物的种子大小选择:再审视
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;35(1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/BF00345538.