Huey Raymond B
Department of Zoology NJ-15, University of Washington Seattle, 98195, Washington, USA.
Oecologia. 1979 Jan;38(3):249-259. doi: 10.1007/BF00345186.
The Sechura Desert of Peru is among the most arid, barren regions of South America. Four species of nocturnal geckos (Phyllodactylus) are parapatric in part of the desert. By comparing niche associations of these species in allopatry and parapatry, I attempt to determine whether the observed parapatric distributions and niche dimension complementarity are related to competition - as is frequently assumed. While parapatry suggests a role for competition, distributional patterns can alternatively be related to adaptations of geckos to different physical environments (sandy desert and rocky foothill) that abut in the study area. Niche complementarity might also be a result of competition, but potentially contradictory evidence suggests that niche complementarity might instead be the result of adaptations developed in allopatry and having no relationship to competition. The ambiguity of these interpretations sets limits on the significance of this kind of evidence: in the absence of attempts to falsify alternative explanations, observations of parapatry or of niche dimension complementarity do not demonstrate conclusively the impact of competition as a force structuring communities.
秘鲁的塞丘拉沙漠是南美洲最干旱、最贫瘠的地区之一。四种夜行性壁虎(叶趾虎属)在该沙漠的部分区域呈邻域分布。通过比较这些物种在异域分布和邻域分布中的生态位关联,我试图确定观察到的邻域分布和生态位维度互补性是否与竞争有关——这是人们经常假设的情况。虽然邻域分布表明竞争起到了作用,但分布模式也可能与壁虎对研究区域内相邻的不同物理环境(沙地沙漠和岩石山麓)的适应有关。生态位互补性也可能是竞争的结果,但潜在的矛盾证据表明,生态位互补性可能反而源于在异域环境中形成的适应,与竞争无关。这些解释的模糊性限制了这类证据的重要性:在没有尝试证伪其他解释的情况下,邻域分布或生态位维度互补性的观察结果并不能确凿地证明竞争作为构建群落的一种力量所产生的影响。