Morton A C
Department of Biology, University of Southampton, Building 44, The University, SO9 5NH, Southampton, U.K.
Oecologia. 1982 Apr;53(1):105-110. doi: 10.1007/BF00377143.
As a preliminary to a population study using markrelease-recapture techniques, specimens of the Satyrid buttfly Melanargia galathea (L.) were subjected to a number of marking and capture techniques. Although the adults are thought to display both aposematic and cryptic coloration, the use of marks of different sizes and colours had no significant effect on recapture frequencies. However, repeated disturbance due to capture was found to significantly reduce recapture frequency. The influence of the different techniques on recapture frequencies could not be detected reliably by excessively low recapture rates, or by comparisons to Poisson distributions. It is suggested that these comparisons are of limited value as measures of the suitability of a marking or handling scheme. Subsequent work showed that capture affected recapture rates of several other species. Moreover, these effects could not be readily predicted from knowledge of the biology of these species. The implications of these findings are discussed.
作为使用标记-释放-再捕获技术进行种群研究的前期工作,对眼蝶科蝴蝶盖眼斑蝶(Melanargia galathea (L.))的标本采用了多种标记和捕获技术。尽管成虫被认为兼具警戒色和保护色,但使用不同大小和颜色的标记对再捕获频率并无显著影响。然而,发现因捕获导致的反复干扰会显著降低再捕获频率。通过过低的再捕获率或与泊松分布进行比较,无法可靠地检测到不同技术对再捕获频率的影响。有人提出,这些比较作为衡量标记或处理方案适用性的指标,其价值有限。后续研究表明,捕获会影响其他几种物种的再捕获率。此外,根据这些物种的生物学知识,无法轻易预测这些影响。本文讨论了这些发现的意义。