Suppr超能文献

依那普利与噻嗪类利尿剂在老年高血压患者中的比较。

Comparison of enalapril and thiazide diuretics in the elderly hypertensive patient.

作者信息

Schnaper H W, Stein G, Schoenberger J A, Leon A S, Tuck M L, Taylor A A, Liss C, Shapiro D A

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Center for Aging, University of Alabama, Birmingham.

出版信息

Gerontology. 1987;33 Suppl 1:24-35. doi: 10.1159/000212916.

Abstract

One hundred seventy-four patients, 65 years of age or older, entered a double-blind, seven-center, 16-week, controlled study to compare the effects of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in an elderly hypertensive population. Sixty-eight percent of the patients were men, 32% were women. Thirty-two percent of the patients had isolated systolic hypertension. Approximately 80% of the patients were white. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, patients with sitting diastolic BP (DBP) of 90-120 mm Hg or systolic BP (SBP) greater than or equal to 160 mg Hg and DBP less than 90 mm Hg (isolated systolic hypertension) were randomized to receive 10 mg of enalapril or 12.5 mg of HCTZ once daily. If after 4 weeks their BPs were not controlled (i.e., DBP greater than 85 mm Hg or SBP greater than 140 mm Hg), the dose of the drug was doubled. If after successive 4-week intervals, their BPs were still not controlled, the other drug was added to their regimen and this was then doubled. The initial mean BPs were 167/94 mm Hg in both groups. By the end of the monotherapy phase at 8 weeks, the mean BPs had fallen significantly (p less than or equal to 0.01) to 148/85 mm Hg in both groups. By 16 weeks, the mean BPs had again fallen similarly: in the enalapril group to 144/83 mm Hg, and in the HCTZ group to 145/83 mm Hg. Seventy-nine percent of the enalapril group and 85% of the HCTZ group had controlled BPs at this time (DBP less than or equal to 85 or SBP less than or equal to 140 mm Hg). White and nonwhite patients in both drug groups had similar falls in SBP and DBP both at the end of the monotherapy period and the overall study. The white patients experienced more rapid falls in BP with enalapril, the nonwhite patients with HCTZ. Three serious adverse experiences occurred in the enalapril group, none of which were considered likely to be due to the drug therapy. Overall, 49% of the enalapril group and 61% of the HCTZ group reported an adverse effect during the study (not significant). Laboratory adverse effects occurred 10% more frequently in the HCTZ group: enalapril, 22%; HCTZ, 32% (not significant); none was serious. Both drugs therefore appeared to be equally efficacious antihypertensive agents in these elderly patients.

摘要

174名65岁及以上的患者参与了一项双盲、七中心、为期16周的对照研究,以比较依那普利和氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)在老年高血压人群中的效果。68%的患者为男性,32%为女性。32%的患者患有单纯收缩期高血压。约80%的患者为白人。在为期4周的安慰剂导入期后,坐位舒张压(DBP)为90 - 120 mmHg或收缩压(SBP)大于或等于160 mmHg且DBP小于90 mmHg(单纯收缩期高血压)的患者被随机分组,每日一次接受10 mg依那普利或12.5 mg HCTZ治疗。如果4周后他们的血压未得到控制(即DBP大于85 mmHg或SBP大于140 mmHg),药物剂量加倍。如果在连续4周的间隔后,他们的血压仍未得到控制,则在治疗方案中添加另一种药物,然后该药物剂量加倍。两组患者的初始平均血压均为167/94 mmHg。到8周单药治疗阶段结束时,两组患者的平均血压均显著下降(p≤0.01)至148/85 mmHg。到16周时,平均血压再次出现类似下降:依那普利组降至144/83 mmHg,HCTZ组降至145/83 mmHg。此时,依那普利组79%的患者和HCTZ组85%的患者血压得到控制(DBP≤85或SBP≤140 mmHg)。两个药物组中的白人患者和非白人患者在单药治疗期结束时以及整个研究期间的SBP和DBP下降情况相似。白人患者使用依那普利时血压下降更快,非白人患者使用HCTZ时血压下降更快。依那普利组发生了3次严重不良事件,均不认为可能是药物治疗所致。总体而言,依那普利组49%的患者和HCTZ组61%的患者在研究期间报告了不良反应(无显著差异)。HCTZ组发生实验室不良反应的频率高10%:依那普利组为22%;HCTZ组为32%(无显著差异);均不严重。因此,在这些老年患者中,两种药物似乎都是同样有效的抗高血压药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验