Suppr超能文献

依那普利与氢氯噻嗪对老年轻至中度高血压患者的疗效比较评估

Comparative evaluation of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Gums J G, Lopez L M, Quay G P, Stein G H, McCarley D L

机构信息

College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville 32610.

出版信息

Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1988 Sep;22(9):680-4. doi: 10.1177/106002808802200905.

Abstract

Initial treatment of elderly hypertensive patients with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor is currently discouraged due to such patients' typical low-renin profile. To validate this principle, we studied 38 elderly males (aged greater than or equal to 65 years) with mild to moderate hypertension, comparing hemodynamic responses to and subjective impressions of enalapril or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). After gradual withdrawal of existing antihypertensive therapy and a four-week, single-blind placebo period, each patient was randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive either enalapril 10-20 mg/d or HCTZ 12.5-25 mg/d for two to four weeks. Combination therapy with both agents was employed if either alone failed to reduce seated diastolic BP to less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. Equivalent proportions of patients receiving enalapril or HCTZ (8 of 19 and 10 of 19, respectively; p = ns) responded with significant reductions in systolic and diastolic BP in seated and standing positions. Combination therapy was most effective in patients receiving HCTZ prior to enalapril. In patients receiving enalapril before HCTZ, BP changes were minimal. No adverse effects were observed in the enalapril group but occurred in an equivalent fraction of patients in the other groups (4 of 10 HCTZ alone, 6 of 20 enalapril + HCTZ; p = ns). We conclude that enalapril may be considered a reasonable monotherapeutic antihypertensive agent in some elderly patients. Combination with HCTZ is beneficial in patients who fail to respond adequately to HCTZ alone.

摘要

由于老年高血压患者典型的低肾素状态,目前不提倡使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂对其进行初始治疗。为验证这一原则,我们研究了38名年龄大于或等于65岁的轻度至中度高血压老年男性,比较了他们对依那普利或氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的血流动力学反应和主观感受。在逐渐停用现有的抗高血压治疗药物并经过为期四周的单盲安慰剂期后,每位患者以双盲方式随机接受依那普利10 - 20 mg/d或HCTZ 12.5 - 25 mg/d治疗两至四周。如果单独使用任何一种药物都未能将坐位舒张压降至小于或等于90 mmHg,则采用两种药物联合治疗。接受依那普利或HCTZ治疗的患者中,坐位和站立位收缩压和舒张压显著降低的比例相当(分别为19人中的8人和19人中的10人;p = 无显著性差异)。联合治疗对先接受HCTZ治疗后接受依那普利治疗的患者最有效。在先接受依那普利治疗后接受HCTZ治疗的患者中,血压变化最小。依那普利组未观察到不良反应,但其他组中相当比例的患者出现了不良反应(单独使用HCTZ的10人中4人,依那普利 + HCTZ的20人中6人;p = 无显著性差异)。我们得出结论,在一些老年患者中,依那普利可被视为一种合理的单一抗高血压药物。对于单独使用HCTZ反应不佳的患者,与HCTZ联合使用有益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验