Suppr超能文献

首个确定立即旋转交叉配血法对抗体筛查阴性受血者进行红细胞输血安全性的印度研究。

First Indian study to establish safety of immediate-spin crossmatch for red blood cell transfusion in antibody screen-negative recipients.

作者信息

Tiwari Aseem Kumar, Aggarwal Geet, Dara Ravi C, Arora Dinesh, Gupta Gautam Kumar, Raina Vimarsh

机构信息

Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

Department of Laboratory and Transfusion Services, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

出版信息

Asian J Transfus Sci. 2017 Jan-Jun;11(1):40-44. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.200774.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The US Food and Drug Administration and American Association of Blood Banks approved the type and screen approach in 1980s, long after antibody screen (AS) was introduced in 1950s. The present study omits conventional anti-human globulin (AHG) crossmatch and replaces it with immediate-spin (IS) crossmatch as part of pretransfusion testing in AS-negative patients to study the safety and effectiveness of IS crossmatch in recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective longitudinal study was conducted on over 5000 red cell units transfused to AS-negative patients admitted to the hospital. Pretransfusion testing comprised blood grouping and AS followed by IS crossmatch, at the time of issue of red cell unit. The patients were transfused IS compatible red cell units. AHG crossmatch was performed posttransfusion for all red cell units. Any incompatible AHG crossmatch was followed up as suspected transfusion reaction.

RESULTS

A total of 5023 red cell units were transfused to 2402 patients with negative AS. 99.7% IS compatible red cell units were also compatible on posttransfusion AHG crossmatch. Anti-P1 alloantibody was identified in one patient who was transfused two IS crossmatch compatible units but later both units were incompatible on AHG crossmatch. There was no clinical or serological sign of hemolysis in the patient.

CONCLUSION

In AS-negative patients, IS crossmatch is as safe as conventional AHG crossmatch and can, therefore, replace conventional AHG crossmatch protocol.

摘要

背景与目的

美国食品药品监督管理局和美国血库协会于20世纪80年代批准了血型鉴定和筛查方法,这距离20世纪50年代引入抗体筛查(AS)已经过去了很长时间。本研究省略了传统的抗人球蛋白(AHG)交叉配血,取而代之的是在AS阴性患者的输血前检测中采用立即离心(IS)交叉配血,以研究IS交叉配血在受血者中的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

本前瞻性纵向研究对超过5000个输注给入院AS阴性患者的红细胞单位进行。输血前检测包括血型鉴定和AS,随后在发放红细胞单位时进行IS交叉配血。患者输注的是IS相容的红细胞单位。所有红细胞单位在输血后进行AHG交叉配血。任何不相容的AHG交叉配血都作为疑似输血反应进行随访。

结果

共向2402例AS阴性患者输注了5023个红细胞单位。99.7%的IS相容红细胞单位在输血后AHG交叉配血中也相容。在一名患者中鉴定出抗P1同种抗体,该患者输注了两个IS交叉配血相容的单位,但后来这两个单位在AHG交叉配血中均不相容。该患者没有溶血的临床或血清学迹象。

结论

在AS阴性患者中,IS交叉配血与传统的AHG交叉配血一样安全,因此可以取代传统的AHG交叉配血方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9e3/5345279/9d928ef37b15/AJTS-11-40-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验