Cawston-Grant Brie, Morrison Hali, Menon Geetha, Sloboda Ron S
Department of Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 May;18(3):16-27. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12061. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
Model-based dose calculation algorithms have recently been incorporated into brachytherapy treatment planning systems, and their introduction requires critical evaluation before clinical implementation. Here, we present an experimental evaluation of Oncentra Brachy Advanced Collapsed-cone Engine (ACE) for a multichannel vaginal cylinder (MCVC) applicator using radiochromic film. A uniform dose of 500 cGy was specified to the surface of the MCVC using the TG-43 dose formalism under two conditions: (a) with only the central channel loaded or (b) only the peripheral channels loaded. Film measurements were made at the applicator surface and compared to the doses calculated using TG-43, standard accuracy ACE (sACE), and high accuracy ACE (hACE). When the central channel of the applicator was used, the film measurements showed a dose increase of (11 ± 8)% (k = 2) above the two outer grooves on the applicator surface. This increase in dose was confirmed with the hACE calculations, but was not confirmed with the sACE calculations at the applicator surface. When the peripheral channels were used, a periodic azimuthal variation in measured dose was observed around the applicator. The sACE and hACE calculations confirmed this variation and agreed within 1% of each other at the applicator surface. Additionally for the film measurements with the central channel used, a baseline dose variation of (10 ± 4)% (k = 2) of the mean dose was observed azimuthally around the applicator surface, which can be explained by offset source positioning in the central channel.
基于模型的剂量计算算法最近已被纳入近距离放射治疗治疗计划系统,在临床应用前,其引入需要进行严格评估。在此,我们使用放射性色胶片对多通道阴道圆柱体(MCVC)施源器的Oncentra Brachy高级坍缩圆锥引擎(ACE)进行了实验评估。在两种情况下,使用TG-43剂量形式将500 cGy的均匀剂量指定给MCVC的表面:(a)仅加载中央通道或(b)仅加载外围通道。在施源器表面进行胶片测量,并与使用TG-43、标准精度ACE(sACE)和高精度ACE(hACE)计算的剂量进行比较。当使用施源器的中央通道时,胶片测量显示施源器表面两个外凹槽上方的剂量增加了(11±8)%(k = 2)。hACE计算证实了剂量的增加,但施源器表面的sACE计算未证实这一点。当使用外围通道时,在施源器周围观察到测量剂量的周期性方位变化。sACE和hACE计算证实了这种变化,并且在施源器表面彼此之间的误差在1%以内。此外,对于使用中央通道的胶片测量,在施源器表面方位上观察到平均剂量的基线剂量变化为(10±4)%(k = 2),这可以通过中央通道中源的偏移定位来解释。