Suppr超能文献

关节周围多模式药物注射:双侧同期全膝关节置换术的随机对照试验

Anterior vs Posterior Periarticular Multimodal Drug Injections: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Simultaneous Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Laoruengthana Artit, Rattanaprichavej Piti, Rasamimongkol Supachok, Galassi Monton

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2100-2104. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.033. Epub 2017 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, various techniques are used to overcome postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty. A local analgesic infiltration with periarticular multimodal drug injection (PMDI) is favorable because of its simplicity, safety, and efficacy. The present study compared the efficacy of a PMDI at the anterior vs posterior compartments.

METHODS

Forty-six patients were randomized to receive the PMDI at either the anterior or posterior compartment, with the contralateral knee receiving the PMDI at the opposite compartment. The PMDI injected to the posterior capsule, medial and lateral meniscal remnant, was defined as the posterior compartment injection, whereas the injection to the medial retinaculum, quadriceps muscle, pes anserinus, and retropatellar fat pad was defined as the anterior compartment injection. Pain scores at rest, knee flexion angle, quadriceps function, and drainage blood loss were evaluated in both groups.

RESULTS

The anterior PMDI group had significantly lower pain scores at rest during 96 hours postoperatively. On the day of discharge, 19 patients (41.3%) favored the knee with the anterior PMDI, which was superior to 9 patients (19.6%) who favored the knee with the posterior PMDI. The anterior PMDI demonstrated a superior recovery of quadriceps function during the same period, but there was no significant difference in terms of other parameters.

CONCLUSION

The PMDI at the anterior compartment can reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty with potentially better quadriceps function compared with that in the PMDI at the posterior compartment. We recommend infiltrating the anterior compartment with a greater amount of PMDI than the posterior compartment.

摘要

背景

目前,有多种技术用于克服全膝关节置换术后的疼痛。关节周围多模式药物注射(PMDI)进行局部镇痛浸润因其操作简单、安全且有效而备受青睐。本研究比较了PMDI在前侧与后侧间隙的疗效。

方法

46例患者被随机分为在前侧或后侧间隙接受PMDI治疗,对侧膝关节在相反间隙接受PMDI治疗。注入后关节囊、内侧和外侧半月板残余的PMDI被定义为后侧间隙注射,而注入内侧支持带、股四头肌、鹅足和髌下脂肪垫的PMDI被定义为前侧间隙注射。对两组患者的静息疼痛评分、膝关节屈曲角度、股四头肌功能和引流失血量进行评估。

结果

前侧PMDI组术后96小时内的静息疼痛评分显著更低。出院当天,19例患者(41.3%)更倾向于接受前侧PMDI治疗的膝关节,这一比例高于9例(19.6%)更倾向于接受后侧PMDI治疗膝关节的患者。同期,前侧PMDI显示股四头肌功能恢复更佳,但在其他参数方面无显著差异。

结论

与后侧间隙的PMDI相比,前侧间隙的PMDI可减轻全膝关节置换术后的疼痛,且股四头肌功能恢复可能更好。我们建议在前侧间隙注射比后侧间隙更多剂量的PMDI。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验