Ballen Cissy J, Greene Harry W
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Department of Biology Teaching and Learning, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Mar 20;15(3):e2001630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001630. eCollection 2017 Mar.
Taxonomic details of diversity are an essential scaffolding for biology education, yet outdated methods for teaching the tree of life (TOL), as implied by textbook content and usage, are still commonly employed. Here, we show that the traditional approach only vaguely represents evolutionary relationships, fails to denote major events in the history of life, and relies heavily on memorizing near-meaningless taxonomic ranks. Conversely, a clade-based strategy-focused on common ancestry, monophyletic groups, and derived functional traits-is explicitly based on Darwin's "descent with modification," provides students with a rational system for organizing the details of biodiversity, and readily lends itself to active learning techniques. We advocate for a phylogenetic classification that mirrors the TOL, a pedagogical format of increasingly complex but always hierarchical presentations, and the adoption of active learning technologies and tactics.
生物多样性的分类细节是生物教育的重要框架,然而,正如教科书内容和使用情况所暗示的那样,讲授生命之树(TOL)的过时方法仍被普遍采用。在这里,我们表明传统方法只是模糊地呈现进化关系,未能指出生命史上的重大事件,并且严重依赖记忆几乎毫无意义的分类等级。相反,一种基于分支的策略——专注于共同祖先、单系类群和衍生功能特征——明确基于达尔文的“有修改的 descent”,为学生提供了一个组织生物多样性细节的合理系统,并且很容易应用于主动学习技术。我们主张采用一种反映TOL的系统发育分类法,一种呈现方式日益复杂但始终具有层级性的教学形式,并采用主动学习技术和策略。