Cloud Beth A, Zhao Kristin D, Ellingson Arin M, Nassr Ahmad, Windebank Anthony J, An Kai-Nan
Mayo Graduate School, Center for Clinical and Translational Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Rehabilitation Medicine Research Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;98(10):2021-2027.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.014. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
To quantify and compare spinal curvature and shoulder kinematics throughout the manual wheelchair (MWC) propulsion cycle for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) who were seated at 2 different seat dump angles.
Single-group, repeated-measures study.
Academic medical center.
Individuals (N=28) with SCI or spinal cord disease who used MWCs completed a telephone screening, and 21 of them were eligible and completed the study.
Participants' personal MWCs were modified to have seat dump angles of 0° or 14°, with a vertical backrest. Participants completed at least 3 propulsion cycles in each condition, during which spine and shoulder motion data were collected with fiberoptic and electromagnetic sensors, respectively.
Thoracolumbar spinal curvature, glenohumeral kinematics, and scapulothoracic kinematics at the start of push (SP), mid-push (MP), end of push (EP), and mid-recovery.
Participants had significantly less lordosis in the 14° condition for all propulsion events. Median differences ranged from 2.0° to 4.6°. Lordosis differences were more pronounced in those with low SCI. Scapulothoracic internal rotation was increased in the 14° condition at SP and MP (mean differences, 2.5° and 2.7°, respectively). Relative downward rotation increased in the 14° condition at SP and MP (mean differences, 2.4° and 2.1°, respectively). Scapulothoracic differences were more pronounced in those with high SCI. No glenohumeral rotations were significantly different between the conditions.
Scapulothoracic kinematics and spinal curvature differences during propulsion may be associated with the position of other body segments or postural stability. Because no differences were observed at the glenohumeral joint, the risk of subacromial impingement may not be affected by this seat angle change.
对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者在2种不同座椅倾倒角度下手动轮椅(MWC)推进周期中的脊柱曲率和肩部运动学进行量化和比较。
单组重复测量研究。
学术医疗中心。
使用MWC的SCI或脊髓疾病患者(N = 28)完成电话筛查,其中21人符合条件并完成研究。
将参与者的个人MWC改装为座椅倾倒角度为0°或14°,靠背垂直。参与者在每种情况下至少完成3个推进周期,在此期间分别使用光纤和电磁传感器收集脊柱和肩部运动数据。
推起开始(SP)、推起中期(MP)、推起结束(EP)和恢复中期时的胸腰椎脊柱曲率、盂肱关节运动学和肩胛胸壁运动学。
在所有推进事件中,参与者在14°条件下的脊柱前凸明显减少。中位数差异范围为2.0°至4.6°。SCI程度较低者的脊柱前凸差异更明显。在14°条件下,SP和MP时肩胛胸壁内旋增加(平均差异分别为2.5°和2.7°)。在14°条件下,SP和MP时相对向下旋转增加(平均差异分别为2.4°和2.1°)。SCI程度较高者的肩胛胸壁差异更明显。两种条件下盂肱关节旋转无显著差异。
推进过程中的肩胛胸壁运动学和脊柱曲率差异可能与身体其他部位的位置或姿势稳定性有关。由于在盂肱关节未观察到差异,因此这种座椅角度变化可能不会影响肩峰下撞击的风险。