Singh Daniel P, Barani Lonbani Zohreh, Woodruff Maria A, Parker Tony J, Steck Roland, Peake Jonathan M
Tissue Repair and Regeneration Group, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Biofabrication and Tissue Morphology Group, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Front Physiol. 2017 Mar 7;8:93. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00093. eCollection 2017.
Contusion injuries in skeletal muscle commonly occur in contact sport and vehicular and industrial workplace accidents. Icing has traditionally been used to treat such injuries under the premise that it alleviates pain, reduces tissue metabolism, and modifies vascular responses to decrease swelling. Previous research has examined the effects of icing on inflammation and microcirculatory dynamics following muscle injury. However, whether icing influences angiogenesis, collateral vessel growth, or myofiber regeneration remains unknown. We compared the effects of icing vs. a sham treatment on the presence of neutrophils and macrophages; expression of CD34, von Willebrands factor (vWF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and nestin; vessel volume; capillary density; and myofiber regeneration in skeletal after muscle contusion injury in rats. Muscle tissue was collected 1, 3, 7, and 28 d after injury. Compared with uninjured rats, muscles in rats that sustained the contusion injury exhibited major necrosis, inflammation, and increased expression of CD34, vWF, VEGF, and nestin. Compared with the sham treatment, icing attenuated and/or delayed neutrophil and macrophage infiltration; the expression of vWF, VEGF, and nestin; and the change in vessel volume within muscle in the first 7 d after injury ( < 0.05). By contrast, icing did not influence capillary density in muscle 28 d after injury ( = 0.59). The percentage of immature myofibers relative to the total number of fibers was greater in the icing group than in the sham group 28 d after injury ( = 0.026), but myofiber cross-sectional area did not differ between groups after 7 d ( = 0.35) and 28 d ( = 0.30). In conclusion, although icing disrupted inflammation and some aspects of angiogenesis/revascularization, these effects did not result in substantial differences in capillary density or muscle growth.
骨骼肌挫伤常见于接触性运动、车辆及工业工作场所事故中。传统上,冰敷一直被用于治疗此类损伤,其前提是它能减轻疼痛、降低组织代谢并改变血管反应以减轻肿胀。以往研究已探讨了冰敷对肌肉损伤后炎症和微循环动力学的影响。然而,冰敷是否会影响血管生成、侧支血管生长或肌纤维再生仍不清楚。我们比较了冰敷与假处理对大鼠肌肉挫伤后中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞的存在情况、CD34、血管性血友病因子(vWF)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和巢蛋白的表达、血管体积、毛细血管密度以及肌纤维再生的影响。在损伤后1、3、7和28天收集肌肉组织。与未受伤的大鼠相比,遭受挫伤损伤的大鼠肌肉出现了严重坏死、炎症,且CD34、vWF、VEGF和巢蛋白的表达增加。与假处理相比,冰敷在损伤后的前7天减轻和/或延迟了中性粒细胞和巨噬细胞浸润、vWF、VEGF和巢蛋白的表达以及肌肉内血管体积的变化(P<0.05)。相比之下,冰敷对损伤后28天肌肉中的毛细血管密度没有影响(P = 0.59)。损伤后28天,冰敷组中未成熟肌纤维相对于纤维总数的百分比高于假处理组(P = 0.026),但7天(P = 0.35)和28天(P = 0.30)后两组之间的肌纤维横截面积没有差异。总之,尽管冰敷扰乱了炎症以及血管生成/再血管化的某些方面,但这些影响并未导致毛细血管密度或肌肉生长出现实质性差异。