Suppr超能文献

短程辅助庆大霉素治疗严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者的前瞻性观察性队列研究。

Short-Course Adjunctive Gentamicin as Empirical Therapy in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Microbiology.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, and.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;64(12):1731-1736. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix186.

Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Metaanalyses failed to demonstrate clinical benefits of beta lactam plus aminoglycoside combination therapy compared to beta lactam monotherapy in patients with sepsis. However, few data exist on the effects of short-course adjunctive aminoglycoside therapy in sepsis patients with organ failure or shock.

METHODS.: We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in 2 intensive care units in the Netherlands from 2011 to 2015. Local antibiotic protocols recommended empirical gentamicin add-on therapy in only 1 of the units. We used logistic regression analyses to determine the association between gentamicin use and the number of days alive and free of renal failure, shock, and death, all on day 14.

RESULTS.: Of 648 patients enrolled, 245 received gentamicin (222 of 309 [72%] in hospital A and 23 of 339 [7%] in hospital B) for a median duration of 2 days (interquartile range, 1-3). The adjusted odds ratios associated with gentamicin use were 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.94) for renal failure, 1.34 (95% CI, 0.96-1.86) for shock duration, and 1.41 (95% CI, 0.94-2.12) for day-14 mortality. Based on in vitro susceptibilities, inappropriate (initial) gram-negative coverage was given in 9 of 245 (4%) and 18 of 403 (4%) patients treated and not treated with gentamicin, respectively (P = .62).

CONCLUSIONS.: Short-course empirical gentamicin use in patients with sepsis was associated with an increased incidence of renal failure but not with faster reversal of shock or improved survival in a setting with low prevalence of antimicrobial resistance.

摘要

背景

荟萃分析未能证明与β-内酰胺单药治疗相比,β-内酰胺联合氨基糖苷类药物治疗在脓毒症患者中的临床益处。然而,关于在有器官衰竭或休克的脓毒症患者中短程辅助氨基糖苷类治疗效果的数据很少。

方法

我们前瞻性地纳入了 2011 年至 2015 年期间荷兰的 2 个重症监护病房中连续的严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者。当地抗生素方案仅建议在 1 个单位中使用经验性加用庆大霉素。我们使用逻辑回归分析来确定庆大霉素使用与存活且无肾功能衰竭、休克和死亡的天数(第 14 天)之间的关联。

结果

在纳入的 648 名患者中,有 245 名患者接受了庆大霉素治疗(医院 A 中 309 名中的 222 名[72%]和医院 B 中 339 名中的 23 名[7%]),中位疗程为 2 天(四分位间距,1-3)。与使用庆大霉素相关的调整后比值比为肾功能衰竭的 1.39(95%置信区间[CI],1.00-1.94)、休克持续时间的 1.34(95%CI,0.96-1.86)和第 14 天死亡率的 1.41(95%CI,0.94-2.12)。根据体外药敏试验,分别给予 9 名(4%)和 18 名(4%)接受和未接受庆大霉素治疗的 245 名和 403 名患者中(P =.62)初始革兰氏阴性覆盖不当。

结论

在抗生素耐药率低的情况下,脓毒症患者短期经验性使用庆大霉素与肾功能衰竭发生率增加相关,但与休克逆转更快或生存率提高无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验