Choi Kyung-Mi, Hong Seok-Jin, van Deursen Jan M, Kim Sooah, Kim Kyoung Heon, Lee Cheol-Koo
Institute of Animal Molecular Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Division of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences & Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Dec 12;73(1):29-38. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx024.
Rapamycin (RM), a drug that inhibits the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway and responds to nutrient availability, seemingly mimics the effects of caloric restriction (CR) on healthy life span. However, the extent of the mechanistic overlap between RM and CR remains incompletely understood. Here, we compared the impact of CR and RM on cellular metabolic status. Both regimens maintained intracellular ATP through the chronological aging process and showed enhanced mitochondrial capacity. Comparative transcriptome analysis showed that CR had a stronger impact on global gene expression than RM. We observed a like impact on the metabolome and identified distinct metabolites affected by CR and RM. CR severely reduced the level of energy storage molecules including glycogen and lipid droplets, whereas RM did not. RM boosted the production of enzymes responsible for the breakdown of glycogen and lipid droplets. Collectively, these results provide insights into the distinct energy metabolism mechanisms induced by CR and RM, suggesting that these two anti-aging regimens might extend life span through distinctive pathways.
雷帕霉素(RM)是一种抑制雷帕霉素作用靶点(mTOR)通路并对营养物质可利用性产生反应的药物,它似乎能模拟热量限制(CR)对健康寿命的影响。然而,RM与CR之间机制重叠的程度仍未完全明确。在此,我们比较了CR和RM对细胞代谢状态的影响。两种方案在整个时序衰老过程中均维持细胞内ATP水平,并显示出线粒体能力增强。比较转录组分析表明,CR对整体基因表达的影响比RM更强。我们观察到对代谢组有类似影响,并鉴定出受CR和RM影响的不同代谢物。CR显著降低了包括糖原和脂滴在内的能量储存分子水平,而RM则没有。RM促进了负责糖原和脂滴分解的酶的产生。总体而言,这些结果为CR和RM诱导的不同能量代谢机制提供了见解,表明这两种抗衰老方案可能通过不同途径延长寿命。