• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application.通过改进临床试验指南及其应用来改善公众健康。
Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 1;38(21):1632-1637. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx086.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Streamlining the institutional review board process in pragmatic randomized clinical trials: challenges and lessons learned from the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) trial.简化实用随机临床试验的机构审查委员会流程:来自阿司匹林剂量:评估获益和长期效果的以患者为中心的试验(ADAPTABLE)试验的挑战和经验教训。
Trials. 2021 Jan 25;22(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05026-w.
4
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.实用随机对照试验中的伦理问题:对近期文献的综述揭示了伦理论证方面的差距。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x.
5
ACCF/AHA methodology for the development of quality measures for cardiovascular technology: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures.美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会心血管技术质量指标制定方法学:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会绩效指标工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2011 Sep 27;124(13):1483-502. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31822935fc. Epub 2011 Aug 29.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Ethical pitfalls in neonatal comparative effectiveness trials.新生儿比较疗效试验中的伦理陷阱。
Neonatology. 2014;105(4):350-1. doi: 10.1159/000360650. Epub 2014 May 30.
8
Report of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Round Table regulatory workshop update of the evaluation of new agents for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome: Executive summary.欧洲心脏病学会心血管圆桌会议监管研讨会报告:更新治疗急性冠状动脉综合征新药物的评估:执行摘要。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Dec;8(8):745-754. doi: 10.1177/2048872616649859. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
9
Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.队列内试验的伦理与实践:一种新兴的实用试验设计。
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1):9-16. doi: 10.1177/1740774517746620. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
10
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Adding Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises to Core Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Muscle Activity, Disability, and Sleep Quality in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Control Trial.在慢性下腰痛患者中,将膈肌呼吸练习添加到核心稳定练习对疼痛、肌肉活动、功能障碍和睡眠质量的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Chiropr Med. 2023 Dec;22(4):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Sep 2.
2
Knowledge and Attitude towards Clinical Trials among General Population of Northern Saudi Arabia during COVID-19 Era: A Cross-Sectional Study.新冠疫情期间沙特阿拉伯北部普通人群对临床试验的认知与态度:一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 25;11(5):680. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11050680.
3
Making trials part of good clinical care: lessons from the RECOVERY trial.将试验纳入优质临床护理:RECOVERY试验的经验教训。
Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e243-e250. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0083.
4
Good Clinical Trials by removing defensive interpretation of Good Clinical Practice guidelines.通过消除对《药物临床试验质量管理规范》指南的防御性解读来进行良好的临床试验。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Dec;87(12):4552-4559. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14843. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Infectious diseases epidemiology, quantitative methodology, and clinical research in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic: Perspective from a European country.在 COVID-19 大流行期间的传染病流行病学、定量方法学和临床研究:来自一个欧洲国家的观点。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Dec;99:106189. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106189. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Ethical review of patient safety and public health in EU clinical trials legislation: impact of COVID-19 pandemic.欧盟临床试验法规中患者安全与公共卫生的伦理审查:新冠疫情的影响
Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2020;61(1):277-281. doi: 10.47162/RJME.61.1.34.
7
Central statistical monitoring of investigator-led clinical trials in oncology.肿瘤学中研究者主导的临床试验的中央统计监测。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul;25(7):1207-1214. doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01726-6. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
8
Kidney disease trials for the 21st century: innovations in design and conduct.21 世纪的肾脏疾病试验:设计和实施的创新。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020 Mar;16(3):173-185. doi: 10.1038/s41581-019-0212-x. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
9
Challenges in conducting clinical trials in nephrology: conclusions from a Kidney Disease-Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference.肾脏病临床试验面临的挑战:来自改善全球肾脏病预后组织(KDIGO)争议会议的结论
Kidney Int. 2017 Aug;92(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2017.04.019.
10
Adverse Events as End Points: The Need to Account for Both Sides of the Same Coin.以不良事件作为终点:兼顾同一枚硬币的两面之必要性。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 24;6(4):e006018. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006018.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing Expedited Safety Reporting for Drugs and Biologics Subject to an Investigational New Drug Application.优化针对处于研究性新药申请阶段的药物和生物制品的快速安全报告。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Mar;48(2):200-207. doi: 10.1177/2168479013509382.
2
Offline: Data sharing-why editors may have got it wrong.线下:数据共享——为何编辑们可能出错了。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 17;388(10050):1143. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31638-5. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
3
Electronic health records to facilitate clinical research.电子健康记录助力临床研究。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2017 Jan;106(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-016-1025-6. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
Sharing Data from Cardiovascular Clinical Trials--A Proposal.分享心血管临床试验数据——一项提议。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):407-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605260.
5
Toward Fairness in Data Sharing.迈向数据共享中的公平性。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):405-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605654.
6
The Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project--A Mechanism for Data Sharing.耶鲁开放数据访问(YODA)项目——一种数据共享机制。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):403-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607342.
7
Strengthening Research through Data Sharing.通过数据共享加强研究。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Aug 4;375(5):401-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1607282.
8
Challenges to Data Monitoring Committees When Regulatory Authorities Intervene.监管机构干预时数据监测委员会面临的挑战。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 21;374(16):1580-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1601674. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
9
Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds.《良好临床实践指南与实用临床试验:兼顾二者之长》
Circulation. 2016 Mar 1;133(9):872-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019902.
10
Sharing clinical trial data: a proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.分享临床试验数据:来自国际医学期刊编辑委员会的一项提议。
Lancet. 2016 Jan 23;387(10016):e9-e11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01279-9.

通过改进临床试验指南及其应用来改善公众健康。

Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application.

作者信息

Landray Martin J, Bax Jeroen J, Alliot Laurence, Buyse Marc, Cohen Adam, Collins Rory, Hindricks Gerhard, James Stefan K, Lane Sile, Maggioni Aldo P, Meeker-O'Connell Ann, Olsson Gunnar, Pocock Stuart J, Rawlins Michael, Sellors Jonathan, Shinagawa Kaori, Sipido Karin R, Smeeth Liam, Stephens Richard, Stewart Murray W, Stough Wendy Gattis, Sweeney Fergus, Van de Werf Frans, Woods Kerrie, Casadei Barbara

机构信息

Clinical Trial Service Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur Heart J. 2017 Jun 1;38(21):1632-1637. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx086.

DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx086
PMID:
28329235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5837481/
Abstract

Evidence generated from randomized controlled trials forms the foundation of cardiovascular therapeutics and has led to the adoption of numerous drugs and devices that prolong survival and reduce morbidity, as well as the avoidance of interventions that have been shown to be ineffective or even unsafe. Many aspects of cardiovascular research have evolved considerably since the first randomized trials in cardiology were conducted. In order to be large enough to provide reliable evidence about effects on major outcomes, cardiovascular trials may now involve thousands of patients recruited from hundreds of clinical sites in many different countries. Costly infrastructure has developed to meet the increasingly complex organizational and operational requirements of these clinical trials. Concerns have been raised that this approach is unsustainable, inhibiting the reliable evaluation of new and existing treatments, to the detriment of patient care. These issues were considered by patients, regulators, funders, and trialists at a meeting of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Roundtable in October 2015. This paper summarizes the key insights and discussions from the workshop, highlights subsequent progress, and identifies next steps to produce meaningful change in the conduct of cardiovascular clinical research.

摘要

随机对照试验产生的证据构成了心血管治疗学的基础,并促使人们采用了许多能够延长生存期、降低发病率的药物和器械,同时避免了那些已被证明无效甚至不安全的干预措施。自心脏病学领域开展首次随机试验以来,心血管研究的许多方面都有了显著发展。为了规模足够大,以便能提供有关对主要结局影响的可靠证据,如今的心血管试验可能涉及从许多不同国家的数百个临床站点招募的数千名患者。为满足这些临床试验日益复杂的组织和操作要求,已经建立了成本高昂的基础设施。有人担心这种方法不可持续,会阻碍对新治疗方法和现有治疗方法进行可靠评估,从而损害患者护理。2015年10月,欧洲心脏病学会心血管圆桌会议上,患者、监管机构、资助者和试验人员对这些问题进行了讨论。本文总结了研讨会上的关键见解和讨论内容,突出了后续进展,并确定了在心血管临床研究实施过程中产生有意义变革的下一步措施。