Branda John A, Strle Klemen, Nigrovic Lise E, Lantos Paul M, Lepore Timothy J, Damle Nitin S, Ferraro Mary Jane, Steere Allen C
Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 15;64(8):1074-1080. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix043.
The conventional 2-tiered serologic testing protocol for Lyme disease (LD), an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) followed by immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G Western blots, performs well in late-stage LD but is insensitive in patients with erythema migrans (EM), the most common manifestation of the illness. Western blots are also complex, difficult to interpret, and relatively expensive. In an effort to improve test performance and simplify testing in early LD, we evaluated several modified 2-tiered testing (MTTT) protocols, which use 2 assays designed as first-tier tests sequentially, without the need of Western blots.
The MTTT protocols included (1) a whole-cell sonicate (WCS) EIA followed by a C6 EIA; (2) a WCS EIA followed by a VlsE chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA); and (3) a variable major protein-like sequence, expressed (VlsE) CLIA followed by a C6 EIA. Sensitivity was determined using serum from 55 patients with erythema migrans; specificity was determined using serum from 50 patients with other illnesses and 1227 healthy subjects.
Sensitivity of the various MTTT protocols in patients with acute erythema migrans ranged from 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 25%-50%) to 54% (95% CI, 42%-67%), compared with 25% (95% CI, 16%-38%) using the conventional protocol (P = .003-0.3). Among control subjects, the 3 MTTT protocols were similarly specific (99.3%-99.5%) compared with conventional 2-tiered testing (99.5% specificity; P = .6-1.0).
Although there were minor differences in sensitivity and specificity among MTTT protocols, each provides comparable or greater sensitivity in acute EM, and similar specificity compared with conventional 2-tiered testing, obviating the need for Western blots.
莱姆病(LD)的传统两层血清学检测方案,即先进行酶免疫测定(EIA),然后进行免疫球蛋白M和免疫球蛋白G免疫印迹法,在晚期莱姆病中表现良好,但对游走性红斑(EM)患者不敏感,而游走性红斑是该病最常见的表现形式。免疫印迹法也很复杂,难以解读,且相对昂贵。为了提高早期莱姆病检测的性能并简化检测过程,我们评估了几种改良的两层检测(MTTT)方案,这些方案依次使用两种设计为一级检测的方法,无需免疫印迹法。
MTTT方案包括:(1)全细胞超声裂解物(WCS)EIA,随后进行C6 EIA;(2)WCS EIA,随后进行VlsE化学发光免疫测定(CLIA);(3)可变主要蛋白样序列表达(VlsE)CLIA,随后进行C6 EIA。使用55例游走性红斑患者的血清测定敏感性;使用50例其他疾病患者的血清和1227名健康受试者的血清测定特异性。
与使用传统方案的25%(95%置信区间[CI],16%-38%)相比,各种MTTT方案在急性游走性红斑患者中的敏感性范围为36%(95%CI,25%-50%)至54%(95%CI,42%-67%)(P =.003 - 0.3)。在对照受试者中,与传统两层检测(特异性为99.5%)相比,这三种MTTT方案的特异性相似(99.3%-99.5%)(P =.6 - 1.)。
尽管MTTT方案在敏感性和特异性上存在细微差异,但每种方案在急性游走性红斑中都具有相当或更高的敏感性,且与传统两层检测相比特异性相似,无需进行免疫印迹法。