Service of Hybrid Cardio Imaging, Madonna della Fiducia Clinic, Rome, Italy; Ostia Radiologica, Ostia, Italy; Etisan, Rome, Italy.
Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;10(7):787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.10.023. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
This study sought to summarize the evidence on stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) using cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) technology for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The CZT cameras are newly introduced, and comparative data with the conventional Anger technology (Anger-MPI) are lacking.
The diagnostic accuracy of Anger-MPI for detection of angiographically significant CAD is well established; however, less evidence is available on the diagnostic accuracy of CZT-MPI.
Clinical studies comparing CZT-MPI and invasive coronary angiography were systematically searched and abstracted. Calculations of diagnostic accuracy, including sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratio, were obtained with fixed and random effects, reporting point estimates and 95% confidence intervals.
Based on our search, a total of 16 studies (N = 2,092) were included. The sensitivity of CZT-MPI was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78 to 0.89), whereas the specificity of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.62 to 0.76) was significantly reduced. The positive likelihood ratio was 2.73 (95% CI: 2.21 to 3.39), the negative likelihood ratio was 0.24 (95% CI: 0.17 to 0.31), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 11.93 (95% CI: 7.84 to 17.42). At subgroup and meta-regression analyses, the diagnostic accuracy between D-SPECT and Discovery cameras was similar (p = 0.711) and not impacted upon by smaller sample size studies (p = 0.573).
CZT-MPI has satisfactory sensitivity for angiographically significant CAD, but its suboptimal specificity warrants further development and research.
本研究旨在总结使用碲锌镉(CZT)技术进行应激心肌灌注成像(MPI)诊断阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的证据。CZT 相机是新引入的,缺乏与传统的 Anger 技术(Anger-MPI)的比较数据。
Anger-MPI 诊断 CAD 的准确性已得到充分证实;然而,关于 CZT-MPI 的诊断准确性的证据较少。
系统搜索并摘要了比较 CZT-MPI 和有创冠状动脉造影的临床研究。使用固定和随机效应计算诊断准确性,包括敏感性、特异性、似然比和诊断比值比,并报告点估计值和 95%置信区间。
根据我们的搜索,共纳入 16 项研究(N=2092)。CZT-MPI 的敏感性为 0.84(95%置信区间 [CI]:0.78 至 0.89),而特异性为 0.69(95% CI:0.62 至 0.76)显著降低。阳性似然比为 2.73(95% CI:2.21 至 3.39),阴性似然比为 0.24(95% CI:0.17 至 0.31),诊断比值比为 11.93(95% CI:7.84 至 17.42)。在亚组和荟萃回归分析中,D-SPECT 和 Discovery 相机之间的诊断准确性相似(p=0.711),且较小样本量研究对其无影响(p=0.573)。
CZT-MPI 对有意义的 CAD 具有良好的敏感性,但特异性不理想,需要进一步开发和研究。