Ishihara Masaru, Onoguchi Masahisa, Taniguchi Yasuyo, Shibutani Takayuki
Department of Radiology, Hyogo Cancer Center, 13-70 Kitaoji, Akashi, Hyogo, 673-8558, Japan.
Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, 5-11-80 Kodatsuno, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, 920-0942, Japan.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;33(12):2057-2066. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1205-0. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
The aim of this study was to clarify the differences in thallium-201-chloride (thallium-201) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) scans evaluated by conventional anger-type single-photon emission computed tomography (conventional SPECT) versus cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT (CZT SPECT) imaging in normal databases for different ethnic groups. MPI scans from 81 consecutive Japanese patients were examined using conventional SPECT and CZT SPECT and analyzed with the pre-installed quantitative perfusion SPECT (QPS) software. We compared the summed stress score (SSS), summed rest score (SRS), and summed difference score (SDS) for the two SPECT devices. For a normal MPI reference, we usually use Japanese databases for MPI created by the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine, which can be used with conventional SPECT but not with CZT SPECT. In this study, we used new Japanese normal databases constructed in our institution to compare conventional and CZT SPECT. Compared with conventional SPECT, CZT SPECT showed lower SSS (p < 0.001), SRS (p = 0.001), and SDS (p = 0.189) using the pre-installed SPECT database. In contrast, CZT SPECT showed no significant difference from conventional SPECT in QPS analysis using the normal databases from our institution. Myocardial perfusion analyses by CZT SPECT should be evaluated using normal databases based on the ethnic group being evaluated.
本研究的目的是阐明在不同种族的正常数据库中,通过传统的安捷型单光子发射计算机断层扫描(传统SPECT)与碲化镉锌SPECT(CZT SPECT)成像评估的氯化铊-201(铊-201)心肌灌注显像(MPI)扫描的差异。使用传统SPECT和CZT SPECT对81例连续的日本患者的MPI扫描进行检查,并使用预安装的定量灌注SPECT(QPS)软件进行分析。我们比较了两种SPECT设备的负荷总分(SSS)、静息总分(SRS)和总分差(SDS)。对于正常的MPI参考,我们通常使用日本核医学协会创建的日本MPI数据库,该数据库可用于传统SPECT,但不能用于CZT SPECT。在本研究中,我们使用在我们机构构建的新的日本正常数据库来比较传统SPECT和CZT SPECT。与传统SPECT相比,使用预安装的SPECT数据库时,CZT SPECT的SSS(p<0.001)、SRS(p=0.001)和SDS(p=0.189)较低。相比之下,在使用我们机构的正常数据库进行的QPS分析中,CZT SPECT与传统SPECT没有显著差异。应使用基于所评估种族的正常数据库来评估CZT SPECT的心肌灌注分析。