Bouget P, Breque C, Beranger J S, Faure J P, Khiami F, Vendeuvre T
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Center of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
ABS Lab, University School of Medicine of Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
J Exp Orthop. 2017 Dec;4(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40634-017-0084-6. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
Purpose and hypothesis: Patellar ligament rupture is a rare disabling pathology requiring a surgical ligament suture protected by a frame. The gold standard is the steel cable, but its rigidity and the necessity of a surgical re-intervention for its removal render it unsatisfactory. The objective of this paper is to quantify the mechanical protection provided by the terylene® in comparison with steel.
Twenty-four knees of 12 fresh frozen cadaveric subjects were divided into 2 homogeneous groups (terylene and steel) of 12 knees (mean age = 69.3 years). Proximal ligament repair was performed according to a three-tunnel transosseous reinsertion technique. Mechanical tests were performed in flexion to simulate movement of the knee. The interligament gap and the amplitude angulation of the knee were measured by a system of extensometer and optical goniometer. Mechanical analysis permitted calculation of flexion amplitude for a ligament gap of 1 and 2 mm taking as initial angle the adjusting angle of pretension of the protection frame. Study of deformations of frames was performed. Statistical analysis was performed with a Wilcoxon Mann Whitney test.
There is no significant difference in protection of the ligament suture between the "terylene" and "steel" groups. Mean flexion amplitudes (mΔF) show no significant differences between the 2 groups for a distension of the suture of 1 mm (m ΔF terylene1 = 4.74 °; mΔF steel1 = 5.91°; p = 0.198) and 2 mm (mΔF terylene2 = 8.71°; mΔF steel2 = 10.41°; p = 0.114). Elastic deformation of terylene was significantly greater than that of steel (p = 0.0004).
Suture protection of the patellar ligament by a terylene wire is not significantly different from that provided by steel frame. The elastic properties of terylene and absence of a need for re intervention to secure its removal lead us towards its use in acute ruptures of the patellar ligament. The main limits involve the properties of the chain extenders with no contraction/muscle shortening and partial dehydration of tendons and ligaments and the mean age of 69.3 years. Level 5.
目的与假设:髌韧带断裂是一种罕见的致残性病变,需要通过框架保护进行手术韧带缝合。金标准是钢丝,但它的刚性以及移除时需要再次手术干预使其不尽人意。本文的目的是量化涤纶与钢丝相比所提供的机械保护。
12具新鲜冷冻尸体的24个膝关节被分为两组(涤纶组和钢丝组),每组12个膝关节(平均年龄 = 69.3岁)。根据三隧道经骨重新插入技术进行近端韧带修复。在膝关节屈曲时进行力学测试以模拟膝关节运动。通过引伸计和光学测角仪系统测量韧带间隙和膝关节的角度变化幅度。力学分析允许计算韧带间隙为1毫米和2毫米时的屈曲幅度,以保护框架的预紧调整角度作为初始角度。对框架的变形进行了研究。采用Wilcoxon Mann Whitney检验进行统计分析。
“涤纶”组和“钢丝”组在韧带缝合保护方面无显著差异。对于1毫米(mΔF涤纶1 = 4.74°;mΔF钢丝1 = 5.91°;p = 0.198)和2毫米(mΔF涤纶2 = 8.71°;mΔF钢丝2 = 10.41°;p = 0.114)的缝线拉伸,两组的平均屈曲幅度(mΔF)无显著差异。涤纶的弹性变形明显大于钢丝(p = 0.0004)。
涤纶线对髌韧带的缝合保护与钢框架提供的保护无显著差异。涤纶的弹性特性以及无需再次干预即可确保其移除,使我们倾向于将其用于髌韧带急性断裂。主要限制包括链延长剂的特性、无收缩/肌肉缩短以及肌腱和韧带的部分脱水,以及平均年龄69.3岁。5级。