• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

裸子植物和开花植物之间分子进化速率和选择模式的对比

Contrasting Rates of Molecular Evolution and Patterns of Selection among Gymnosperms and Flowering Plants.

作者信息

De La Torre Amanda R, Li Zhen, Van de Peer Yves, Ingvarsson Pär K

机构信息

Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.

Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jun 1;34(6):1363-1377. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx069.

DOI:10.1093/molbev/msx069
PMID:28333233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5435085/
Abstract

The majority of variation in rates of molecular evolution among seed plants remains both unexplored and unexplained. Although some attention has been given to flowering plants, reports of molecular evolutionary rates for their sister plant clade (gymnosperms) are scarce, and to our knowledge differences in molecular evolution among seed plant clades have never been tested in a phylogenetic framework. Angiosperms and gymnosperms differ in a number of features, of which contrasting reproductive biology, life spans, and population sizes are the most prominent. The highly conserved morphology of gymnosperms evidenced by similarity of extant species to fossil records and the high levels of macrosynteny at the genomic level have led scientists to believe that gymnosperms are slow-evolving plants, although some studies have offered contradictory results. Here, we used 31,968 nucleotide sites obtained from orthologous genes across a wide taxonomic sampling that includes representatives of most conifers, cycads, ginkgo, and many angiosperms with a sequenced genome. Our results suggest that angiosperms and gymnosperms differ considerably in their rates of molecular evolution per unit time, with gymnosperm rates being, on average, seven times lower than angiosperm species. Longer generation times and larger genome sizes are some of the factors explaining the slow rates of molecular evolution found in gymnosperms. In contrast to their slow rates of molecular evolution, gymnosperms possess higher substitution rate ratios than angiosperm taxa. Finally, our study suggests stronger and more efficient purifying and diversifying selection in gymnosperm than in angiosperm species, probably in relation to larger effective population sizes.

摘要

种子植物分子进化速率的大部分差异仍未得到探索和解释。虽然已经对开花植物给予了一些关注,但关于其姊妹植物类群(裸子植物)分子进化速率的报道却很少,据我们所知,种子植物类群之间分子进化的差异从未在系统发育框架中进行过测试。被子植物和裸子植物在许多特征上存在差异,其中最突出的是生殖生物学、寿命和种群大小的差异。裸子植物高度保守的形态学特征,表现为现存物种与化石记录的相似性以及基因组水平上的高度宏观同线性,这使得科学家们认为裸子植物是进化缓慢的植物,尽管一些研究给出了相互矛盾的结果。在这里,我们使用了从广泛分类取样的直系同源基因中获得的31968个核苷酸位点,该取样包括大多数针叶树、苏铁、银杏的代表以及许多具有测序基因组的被子植物。我们的结果表明,被子植物和裸子植物的单位时间分子进化速率存在显著差异,裸子植物的速率平均比被子植物低七倍。较长的世代时间和较大的基因组大小是解释裸子植物分子进化速率缓慢的一些因素。与它们缓慢的分子进化速率相反,裸子植物的替代率比被子植物类群更高。最后,我们的研究表明,裸子植物中的纯化选择和多样化选择比被子植物更强且更有效,这可能与更大的有效种群大小有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c318/5435085/ce7439c6c3dc/msx069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c318/5435085/6296fb587f6e/msx069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c318/5435085/ce7439c6c3dc/msx069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c318/5435085/6296fb587f6e/msx069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c318/5435085/ce7439c6c3dc/msx069f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Contrasting Rates of Molecular Evolution and Patterns of Selection among Gymnosperms and Flowering Plants.裸子植物和开花植物之间分子进化速率和选择模式的对比
Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jun 1;34(6):1363-1377. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx069.
2
Phylogenomics resolves the deep phylogeny of seed plants and indicates partial convergent or homoplastic evolution between Gnetales and angiosperms.系统基因组学解决了种子植物的深层系统发育关系,并表明买麻藤目和被子植物之间存在部分趋同或同型演化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Jun 27;285(1881). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1012.
3
MADS-Box gene diversity in seed plants 300 million years ago.3亿年前种子植物中的MADS盒基因多样性。
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Oct;17(10):1425-34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026243.
4
Ecological and genetic factors linked to contrasting genome dynamics in seed plants.与种子植物中截然不同的基因组动态相关的生态和遗传因素。
New Phytol. 2012 May;194(3):629-646. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04105.x. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
5
Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers.基于所有三个基因组部分的种子植物系统发育:现存裸子植物是单系的,买麻藤目最亲近的亲属是针叶树。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4092-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4092.
6
Plastid phylogenomic analysis of green plants: A billion years of evolutionary history.绿色植物质体基因组分析:十亿年的进化历史。
Am J Bot. 2018 Mar;105(3):291-301. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1048. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
MADS goes genomic in conifers: towards determining the ancestral set of MADS-box genes in seed plants.MADS基因在针叶树中走向基因组化:迈向确定种子植物中MADS盒基因的祖先集。
Ann Bot. 2014 Nov;114(7):1407-29. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu066. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
Angiosperm divergence times: the effect of genes, codon positions, and time constraints.被子植物的分化时间:基因、密码子位置和时间限制的影响。
Evolution. 2005 Aug;59(8):1653-70. doi: 10.1554/04-565.1.
9
Single-Copy Genes as Molecular Markers for Phylogenomic Studies in Seed Plants.单拷贝基因作为种子植物系统基因组学研究的分子标记
Genome Biol Evol. 2017 May 1;9(5):1130-1147. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evx070.
10
Revisiting the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (PEBP) gene family reveals cryptic FLOWERING LOCUS T gene homologs in gymnosperms and sheds new light on functional evolution.重新审视磷脂酰乙醇胺结合蛋白(PEBP)基因家族,发现裸子植物中存在隐秘的成花素基因同源物,并为功能进化提供了新线索。
New Phytol. 2016 Nov;212(3):730-744. doi: 10.1111/nph.14066. Epub 2016 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
SPEECHLESS duplication in grasses expands potential for environmental regulation of stomatal development.禾本科植物中SPEECHLESS基因的复制扩展了气孔发育环境调控的潜力。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 30:2025.07.29.667563. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.29.667563.
2
The subordinate role of pseudogenization to recombinative deletion following polyploidization in angiosperms.被子植物多倍体化后假基因化相对于重组缺失的次要作用。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 9;16(1):6335. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61676-3.
3
Somatic Evolution of Stem Cell Mutations in Long-Lived Plants.

本文引用的文献

1
Germline replications and somatic mutation accumulation are independent of vegetative life span in Arabidopsis.拟南芥中生殖系复制和体细胞突变积累与营养生长期寿命无关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Oct 25;113(43):12226-12231. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1609686113. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
2
Variation in Linked Selection and Recombination Drive Genomic Divergence during Allopatric Speciation of European and American Aspens.连锁选择和重组的变异驱动欧美山杨异域物种形成过程中的基因组分化。
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jul;33(7):1754-67. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw051. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
3
Expression Divergence Is Correlated with Sequence Evolution but Not Positive Selection in Conifers.
长寿植物中干细胞突变的体细胞进化
Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Jul 30;42(8). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf165.
4
The Genome of Lolium multiflorum Reveals the Genetic Architecture of Paraquat Resistance.多花黑麦草基因组揭示了百草枯抗性的遗传结构。
Mol Ecol. 2025 May;34(10):e17775. doi: 10.1111/mec.17775. Epub 2025 Apr 26.
5
SOI: robust identification of orthologous synteny with the Orthology Index and broad applications in evolutionary genomics.SOI:利用直系同源索引对直系同源同线性进行可靠识别及其在进化基因组学中的广泛应用。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2025 Apr 10;53(7). doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaf320.
6
Multiple Ecological Niche Modeling Reveals Niche Conservatism and Divergence in East Asian Yew ().多重生态位建模揭示了东亚红豆杉的生态位保守性和分化()。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;14(7):1094. doi: 10.3390/plants14071094.
7
Contrasting levels of transcriptome-wide SNP diversity and adaptive molecular variation among conifers.针叶树中全转录组单核苷酸多态性多样性与适应性分子变异的对比水平
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Mar 6;16:1500759. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1500759. eCollection 2025.
8
Cryptic divergence in and evolutionary dynamics of endangered hybrid Picea brachytyla sensu stricto in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.青藏高原濒危杂交种青海云杉(狭义)的隐秘分化及进化动态
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1202. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05851-6.
9
Accurate Inference of the Polyploid Continuum Using Forward-Time Simulations.使用正向时间模拟对多倍体连续统进行准确推断。
Mol Biol Evol. 2024 Dec 6;41(12). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msae241.
10
Pangenome graph analysis reveals extensive effector copy-number variation in spinach downy mildew.泛基因组图谱分析揭示了菠菜霜霉病中广泛的效应物拷贝数变异。
PLoS Genet. 2024 Oct 25;20(10):e1011452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011452. eCollection 2024 Oct.
在松柏目中,表达分歧与序列进化相关,但与正选择无关。
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jun;33(6):1502-16. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw032. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
4
Causes of evolutionary rate variation among protein sites.蛋白质位点间进化速率变化的原因。
Nat Rev Genet. 2016 Feb;17(2):109-21. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.18. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
5
Gene Duplicability of Core Genes Is Highly Consistent across All Angiosperms.核心基因的基因可复制性在所有被子植物中高度一致。
Plant Cell. 2016 Feb;28(2):326-44. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00877. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Natural Selection and Recombination Rate Variation Shape Nucleotide Polymorphism Across the Genomes of Three Related Populus Species.自然选择与重组率变异塑造了三种相关杨树物种基因组中的核苷酸多态性。
Genetics. 2016 Mar;202(3):1185-200. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.183152. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
7
Exploring the Relationships between Mutation Rates, Life History, Genome Size, Environment, and Species Richness in Flowering Plants.探究开花植物的突变率、生活史、基因组大小、环境与物种丰富度之间的关系
Am Nat. 2015 Apr;185(4):507-24. doi: 10.1086/680052. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
8
Genetic architecture and genomic patterns of gene flow between hybridizing species of Picea.遗传结构和基因流在杂交云杉种间的基因组模式。
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Aug;115(2):153-64. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2015.19. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
9
Genome-wide analysis reveals diverged patterns of codon bias, gene expression, and rates of sequence evolution in picea gene families.全基因组分析揭示了云杉基因家族中密码子偏好、基因表达和序列进化速率的不同模式。
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 Mar 5;7(4):1002-15. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv044.
10
Insights into conifer giga-genomes.针叶树超大基因组研究洞察
Plant Physiol. 2014 Dec;166(4):1724-32. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.248708. Epub 2014 Oct 27.