Petropoulos Petalas Diamantis, van Schie Hein, Hendriks Vettehen Paul
Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 23;12(3):e0174353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174353. eCollection 2017.
This study addresses the self-fulfilling prophecy effect, in the domain of economic decision-making. We present experimental data in support of the hypothesis that speculative forecasts of economic change can impact individuals' economic decision behavior, prior to any realized changes. In a within-subjects experiment, participants (N = 40) played 180 trials in a Balloon Analogue Risk Talk (BART) in which they could make actual profit. Simple messages about possible (positive and negative) changes in outcome probabilities of future trials had significant effects on measures of risk taking (number of inflations) and actual profits in the game. These effects were enduring, even though no systematic changes in actual outcome probabilities took place following any of the messages. Risk taking also found to be reflected in reaction times revealing increasing reaction times with riskier decisions. Positive and negative economic forecasts affected reaction times slopes differently, with negative forecasts resulting in increased reaction time slopes as a function of risk. These findings suggest that forecasted positive or negative economic change can bias people's mental model of the economy and reduce or stimulate risk taking. Possible implications for media-fulfilling prophecies in the domain of the economy are considered.
本研究探讨了经济决策领域中的自我实现预言效应。我们提供了实验数据,以支持以下假设:在任何实际变化发生之前,对经济变化的投机性预测会影响个人的经济决策行为。在一项被试内实验中,参与者(N = 40)在气球模拟风险任务(BART)中进行了180次试验,他们可以在其中获得实际利润。关于未来试验结果概率可能(正向和负向)变化的简单信息,对风险承担指标(充气次数)和游戏中的实际利润产生了显著影响。即使在任何信息发布后实际结果概率没有发生系统性变化,这些影响仍然持续存在。研究还发现,风险承担也反映在反应时间上,即风险越高的决策反应时间越长。正向和负向经济预测对反应时间斜率的影响不同,负向预测导致反应时间斜率随风险增加。这些发现表明,预测的正向或负向经济变化会使人们对经济的心理模型产生偏差,并减少或刺激风险承担。我们还考虑了这些发现对经济领域中媒体实现预言的可能影响。