Golden Sherita Hill, Hager Daniel, Gould Lois J, Mathioudakis Nestoras, Pronovost Peter J
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Jan;43(1):18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
In a complex health system, it is important to establish a systematic and data-driven approach to identifying needs. The Diabetes Clinical Community (DCC) of Johns Hopkins Medicine's Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality developed a gap analysis tool and process to establish the system's current state of inpatient diabetes care.
The collectively developed tool assessed the following areas: program infrastructure; protocols, policies, and order sets; patient and health care professional education; and automated data access. For the purposes of this analysis, gaps were defined as those instances in which local resources, infrastructure, or processes demonstrated a variance against the current national evidence base or institutionally defined best practices.
Following the gap analysis, members of the DCC, in collaboration with health system leadership, met to identify priority areas in order to integrate and synergize diabetes care resources and efforts to enhance quality and reduce disparities in care across the system. Key gaps in care identified included lack of standardized glucose management policies, lack of standardized training of health care professionals in inpatient diabetes management, and lack of access to automated data collection and analysis. These results were used to gain resources to support collaborative diabetes health system initiatives and to successfully obtain federal research funding to develop and pilot a pragmatic diabetes educational intervention.
At a health system level, the summary format of this gap analysis tool is an effective method to clearly identify disparities in care to focus efforts and resources to improve care delivery.
在复杂的卫生系统中,建立一种系统的、以数据为驱动的需求识别方法很重要。约翰·霍普金斯大学医学院阿姆斯特朗患者安全与质量研究所的糖尿病临床社区(DCC)开发了一种差距分析工具和流程,以确定该系统目前的住院糖尿病护理状况。
共同开发的工具评估了以下领域:项目基础设施;协议、政策和医嘱集;患者及医护人员教育;以及自动化数据获取。为了本次分析的目的,差距被定义为当地资源、基础设施或流程与当前国家证据基础或机构定义的最佳实践存在差异的情况。
在差距分析之后,DCC成员与卫生系统领导层合作,开会确定优先领域,以便整合和协同糖尿病护理资源与工作,以提高质量并减少整个系统护理中的差异。确定的护理关键差距包括缺乏标准化的血糖管理政策、缺乏对医护人员进行住院糖尿病管理的标准化培训,以及无法获取自动化数据收集和分析。这些结果被用于获取资源,以支持协作性糖尿病卫生系统倡议,并成功获得联邦研究资金,用于开发和试行一种实用的糖尿病教育干预措施。
在卫生系统层面,这种差距分析工具的总结形式是一种有效的方法,能够清晰识别护理差异,从而集中精力和资源以改善护理服务。