Chan Robin F, Shabalin Andrey A, Xie Lin Y, Adkins Daniel E, Zhao Min, Turecki Gustavo, Clark Shaunna L, Aberg Karolina A, van den Oord Edwin J C G
Center for Biomarker Research and Precision Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
Douglas Mental Health University Institute and McGill University, Montréal, Québec H4H 1R3, Canada.
Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jun 20;45(11):e97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx143.
Methylome-wide association studies are typically performed using microarray technologies that only assay a very small fraction of the CG methylome and entirely miss two forms of methylation that are common in brain and likely of particular relevance for neuroscience and psychiatric disorders. The alternative is to use whole genome bisulfite (WGB) sequencing but this approach is not yet practically feasible with sample sizes required for adequate statistical power. We argue for revisiting methylation enrichment methods that, provided optimal protocols are used, enable comprehensive, adequately powered and cost-effective genome-wide investigations of the brain methylome. To support our claim we use data showing that enrichment methods approximate the sensitivity obtained with WGB methods and with slightly better specificity. However, this performance is achieved at <5% of the reagent costs. Furthermore, because many more samples can be sequenced simultaneously, projects can be completed about 15 times faster. Currently the only viable option available for comprehensive brain methylome studies, enrichment methods may be critical for moving the field forward.
全基因组甲基化关联研究通常使用微阵列技术进行,这些技术只能检测CG甲基化组中很小的一部分,并且完全遗漏了在大脑中常见且可能与神经科学和精神疾病特别相关的两种甲基化形式。另一种方法是使用全基因组亚硫酸氢盐(WGB)测序,但这种方法在获得足够统计效力所需的样本量方面尚不实际可行。我们主张重新审视甲基化富集方法,只要使用最佳方案,这些方法就能对大脑甲基化组进行全面、有足够效力且具有成本效益的全基因组研究。为了支持我们的观点,我们使用的数据表明,富集方法接近WGB方法获得的灵敏度,且特异性略高。然而,实现这种性能的试剂成本不到WGB方法的5%。此外,由于可以同时对更多样本进行测序,项目完成速度可以快约15倍。目前,富集方法是全面的大脑甲基化组研究唯一可行的选择,对于推动该领域的发展可能至关重要。