• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚公众对使用税收和标签政策措施来对抗幼儿肥胖问题的偏好。

Public Preferences for the Use of Taxation and Labelling Policy Measures to Combat Obesity in Young Children in Australia.

作者信息

Comans Tracy, Moretto Nicole, Byrnes Joshua

机构信息

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.

Metro North Hospital and Health Service District, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 21;14(3):324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030324.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph14030324
PMID:28335575
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5369160/
Abstract

: Childhood obesity is a serious concern for developed and developing countries. This study aimed to assess the level of support in Australia for regulation and to assess whether systematic differences occur between individuals who support increased regulation and individuals who oppose it. : An online survey ( = 563) was used to assess parental/caregiver preferences for taxation policy options and nutrition labelling designed to address the incidence of childhood obesity. Participants were parents or caregivers of young children (3 to 7 years) who were actively enrolled in an existing birth cohort study in South-East Queensland, Australia. : The majority of the parents (over 80%) strongly agreed or agreed with labelling food and drink with traffic light or teaspoon labelling. Support for taxation was more variable with around one third strongly supporting and a further 40% of participants equivocal about using taxation; however, a quarter strongly rejected this policy. Cluster analysis did not detect any socio-demographic differences between those who strongly supported taxation and those who did not. : Better food labelling would be welcomed by parents to enhance food choices for their children. Taxation for health reasons would not be opposed by most parents. Implications for Public Health: Governments should consider taxation of unhealthy drinks and improved labelling to encourage healthy food purchasing.

摘要

儿童肥胖是发达国家和发展中国家都严重关切的问题。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚对监管的支持程度,并评估支持加强监管的个人与反对加强监管的个人之间是否存在系统性差异。:通过一项在线调查(n = 563)来评估父母/照顾者对旨在解决儿童肥胖发生率的税收政策选项和营养标签的偏好。参与者是澳大利亚昆士兰州东南部一项现有出生队列研究中积极登记的幼儿(3至7岁)的父母或照顾者。:大多数父母(超过80%)强烈同意或同意用红绿灯或茶匙标签标注食品和饮料。对税收的支持则更具变数,约三分之一的人强烈支持,另有40%的参与者对使用税收模棱两可;然而,四分之一的人强烈反对这一政策。聚类分析未发现强烈支持税收的人和不支持税收的人之间存在任何社会人口统计学差异。:更好的食品标签会受到父母的欢迎,以帮助他们为孩子做出更好的食物选择。大多数父母不会反对出于健康原因征税。对公共卫生的影响:政府应考虑对不健康饮料征税并改进标签,以鼓励购买健康食品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e54/5369160/99181682cba1/ijerph-14-00324-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e54/5369160/3300f9ee1eec/ijerph-14-00324-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e54/5369160/99181682cba1/ijerph-14-00324-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e54/5369160/3300f9ee1eec/ijerph-14-00324-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e54/5369160/99181682cba1/ijerph-14-00324-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Public Preferences for the Use of Taxation and Labelling Policy Measures to Combat Obesity in Young Children in Australia.澳大利亚公众对使用税收和标签政策措施来对抗幼儿肥胖问题的偏好。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Mar 21;14(3):324. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14030324.
2
Community perspectives on the use of regulation and law for obesity prevention in children: A citizens' jury.社区对利用监管和法律预防儿童肥胖的看法:公民陪审团。
Health Policy. 2017 May;121(5):566-573. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.001. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
3
Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.是的,政府应该对软饮料征税:澳大利亚公民陪审团的调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Feb 27;11(3):2456-71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110302456.
4
The global context for public health nutrition taxation.公共卫生营养税收的全球背景。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Jan;14(1):176-86. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002053. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
5
Why do the public support or oppose obesity prevention regulations? Results from a South Australian population survey.公众为何支持或反对肥胖预防法规?南澳大利亚州人口调查结果。
Health Promot J Austr. 2019 Jan;30(1):47-59. doi: 10.1002/hpja.185. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
6
Public opinion on food-related obesity prevention policy initiatives.公众对与食品相关的肥胖预防政策措施的看法。
Health Promot J Austr. 2012 Aug;23(2):86-91. doi: 10.1071/he12086.
7
The cost-effectiveness and consumer acceptability of taxation strategies to reduce rates of overweight and obesity among children in Australia: study protocol.澳大利亚儿童超重和肥胖率税收策略的成本效益和消费者接受度研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 14;13:1182. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1182.
8
Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.提交给澳大利亚和新西兰食品标签法与政策评论的意见支持使用红绿灯营养标签。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Oct;36(5):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00913.x.
9
Examining young people's views and understanding of traffic light and physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) food labels.探讨年轻人对红绿灯和体力活动热量等效(PACE)食物标签的看法和理解。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):1143. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16019-6.
10
Effect of Formulation, Labelling, and Taxation Policies on the Nutritional Quality of the Food Supply.制剂、标签和税收政策对食品供应营养质量的影响。
Curr Nutr Rep. 2019 Sep;8(3):240-249. doi: 10.1007/s13668-019-00289-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing childhood obesity through policy: A cross-sectional study in Malta.通过政策解决儿童肥胖问题:马耳他的一项横断面研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2023 Nov 1;64(3):E323-E336. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.3.2938. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Measuring public opinion and acceptability of prevention policies: an integrative review and narrative synthesis of methods.测量公众意见和预防政策的可接受性:方法的综合评价和叙述性综合。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Mar 4;20(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00829-y.
3
Costs, equity and acceptability of three policies to prevent obesity: A narrative review to support policy development.

本文引用的文献

1
Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.对含糖饮料征税以减少中等收入国家的超重和肥胖:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 26;11(9):e0163358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163358. eCollection 2016.
2
Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study.墨西哥对含糖甜味饮料征收消费税情况下商店饮料购买情况的观察性研究。
BMJ. 2016 Jan 6;352:h6704. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6704.
3
Estimated Global, Regional, and National Disease Burdens Related to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption in 2010.
预防肥胖的三项政策的成本、公平性及可接受性:支持政策制定的叙述性综述
Obes Sci Pract. 2020 Jul 10;6(5):562-583. doi: 10.1002/osp4.423. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
The Acceptance of Key Public Health Interventions by the Polish Population Is Related to Health Literacy, But Not eHealth Literacy.波兰人口对关键公共卫生干预措施的接受程度与健康素养有关,但与电子健康素养无关。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 29;17(15):5459. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155459.
5
Political and public acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverages tax: a mixed-method systematic review and meta-analysis.征收含糖饮料税的政治和公众接受度:混合方法系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Sep 4;16(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0843-0.
2010年与含糖饮料消费相关的全球、区域和国家疾病负担估计
Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):639-66. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
4
Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger picture.儿童和青少年肥胖:更大问题的一部分。
Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2510-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61746-3. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
5
An evaluation of the FDA's analysis of the costs and benefits of the graphic warning label regulation.对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于图形警示标签规定的成本效益分析的评估。
Tob Control. 2015 Mar;24(2):112-9. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052022. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
6
Yes, the government should tax soft drinks: findings from a citizens' jury in Australia.是的,政府应该对软饮料征税:澳大利亚公民陪审团的调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Feb 27;11(3):2456-71. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110302456.
7
Environments For Healthy Living (EFHL) Griffith birth cohort study: characteristics of sample and profile of antenatal exposures.健康生活环境(EFHL)格里菲斯出生队列研究:样本特征和产前暴露概况。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 15;12:1080. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1080.
8
An independent audit of the Australian food industry's voluntary front-of-pack nutrition labelling scheme for energy-dense nutrition-poor foods.澳大利亚食品行业自愿使用的高能量、低营养食品包装营养标签计划的独立审计。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jan;67(1):31-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.179. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
9
Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.提交给澳大利亚和新西兰食品标签法与政策评论的意见支持使用红绿灯营养标签。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Oct;36(5):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00913.x.
10
Fast facts: The availability and accessibility of nutrition information in fast food chains.快速事实:快餐连锁店中营养信息的可获得性和可及性。
Health Promot J Austr. 2011 Dec;22(3):184-8. doi: 10.1071/he11184.