• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大数据与人权的动态关系:以科学研究为例

The dynamics of big data and human rights: the case of scientific research.

作者信息

Vayena Effy, Tasioulas John

机构信息

Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, 8001 Zurich, Switzerland

Yeoh Tiong Lay Centre for Politics, Philosophy, and Law, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King's College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK.

出版信息

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0129.

DOI:10.1098/rsta.2016.0129
PMID:28336802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5124070/
Abstract

In this paper, we address the complex relationship between big data and human rights. Because this is a vast terrain, we restrict our focus in two main ways. First, we concentrate on big data applications in scientific research, mostly health-related research. And, second, we concentrate on two human rights: the familiar right to privacy and the less well-known right to science. Our contention is that human rights interact in potentially complex ways with big data, not only constraining it, but also enabling it in various ways; and that such rights are dynamic in character, rather than fixed once and for all, changing in their implications over time in line with changes in the context we inhabit, and also as they interact among themselves in jointly responding to the opportunities and risks thrown up by a changing world. Understanding this dynamic interaction of human rights is crucial for formulating an ethic tailored to the realities-the new capabilities and risks-of the rapidly evolving digital environment.This article is part of the themed issue 'The ethical impact of data science'.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨大数据与人权之间的复杂关系。鉴于这是一个广阔的领域,我们主要从两个方面限定关注范围。其一,我们聚焦于大数据在科学研究中的应用,主要是与健康相关的研究。其二,我们关注两项人权:为人熟知的隐私权以及鲜为人知的科学权。我们的论点是,人权与大数据以潜在复杂的方式相互作用,不仅对大数据有所限制,还以各种方式使其成为可能;而且这些权利具有动态性,并非一成不变,其内涵会随着我们所处环境的变化以及它们自身在共同应对不断变化的世界所带来的机遇和风险时的相互作用而随时间改变。理解人权的这种动态互动对于制定一种契合快速发展的数字环境的现实——新能力和新风险——的伦理准则至关重要。本文是主题为“数据科学的伦理影响”特刊的一部分。

相似文献

1
The dynamics of big data and human rights: the case of scientific research.大数据与人权的动态关系:以科学研究为例
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0129.
2
Locating ethics in data science: responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems.在数据科学中定位伦理:全球和分布式知识生产系统中的责任与问责
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0122.
3
Data science ethics in government.政府中的数据科学伦理
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0119.
4
Beyond privacy and exposure: ethical issues within citizen-facing analytics.超越隐私与曝光:面向公民的分析中的伦理问题。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0132.
5
What is data ethics?什么是数据伦理?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0360.
6
Privacy is an essentially contested concept: a multi-dimensional analytic for mapping privacy.隐私是一个本质上有争议的概念:一种用于描绘隐私的多维度分析方法。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0118.
7
The Ethics of Big Data: Current and Foreseeable Issues in Biomedical Contexts.大数据伦理:生物医学背景下的当前及可预见问题
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Apr;22(2):303-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2. Epub 2015 May 23.
8
A theory of international bioethics: the negotiable and the non-negotiable.国际生物伦理学理论:可协商与不可协商的内容。
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1998 Sep;8(3):233-73. doi: 10.1353/ken.1998.0018.
9
Compelling truth: legal protection of the infosphere against big data spills.引人注目的事实:信息圈免受大数据泄露的法律保护。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0114.
10
The ethics of big data as a public good: which public? Whose good?作为公共利益的大数据伦理:何种公共?谁之利益?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2016 Dec 28;374(2083). doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0126.

引用本文的文献

1
The future regulation of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare services and medical research in the European Union.欧盟医疗服务与医学研究中人工智能系统的未来监管
Front Genet. 2022 Oct 4;13:927721. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.927721. eCollection 2022.
2
Scientific Data Management in the Age of Big Data: An Approach Supporting a Resilience Index Development Effort.大数据时代的科学数据管理:一种支持弹性指数开发工作的方法。
Front Environ Sci. 2019 Jun 4;7(Article 72):1-13. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00072.
3
Considerations for ethics review of big data health research: A scoping review.大数据健康研究的伦理审查考虑因素:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0204937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204937. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Between Openness and Privacy in Genomics.基因组学中的开放性与隐私性
PLoS Med. 2016 Jan 12;13(1):e1001937. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001937. eCollection 2016 Jan.
2
Identity and privacy. Unique in the shopping mall: on the reidentifiability of credit card metadata.身份与隐私。购物中心里的独特之处:信用卡元数据的可再识别性。
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):536-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1256297.
3
The end of privacy. Introduction.
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):490-1. doi: 10.1126/science.347.6221.490.
4
Finding the missing link for big biomedical data.寻找大型生物医学数据的缺失环节。
JAMA. 2014 Jun 25;311(24):2479-80. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4228.
5
Caught in the web: informed consent for online health research.陷入网络:在线健康研究的知情同意。
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Feb 20;5(173):173fs6. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004798.
6
Identifying personal genomes by surname inference.姓氏推断识别个人基因组。
Science. 2013 Jan 18;339(6117):321-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1229566.
7
National data bank: its advocates try to erase "big brother" image.
Science. 1969 Jan 10;163(3863):160-2. doi: 10.1126/science.163.3863.160.
8
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》
Annu Rev Popul Law. 1988;15:148.