Suppr超能文献

欧盟医疗服务与医学研究中人工智能系统的未来监管

The future regulation of artificial intelligence systems in healthcare services and medical research in the European Union.

作者信息

Meszaros Janos, Minari Jusaku, Huys Isabelle

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Centre for IT and IP Law (CiTiP), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Genet. 2022 Oct 4;13:927721. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.927721. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Despite its promising future, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and automated decision-making in healthcare services and medical research faces several legal and ethical hurdles. The European Union (EU) is tackling these issues with the existing legal framework and drafting new regulations, such as the proposed AI Act. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) partly regulates AI systems, with rules on processing personal data and protecting data subjects against solely automated decision-making. In healthcare services, (automated) decisions are made more frequently and rapidly. However, medical research focuses on innovation and efficacy, with less direct decisions on individuals. Therefore, the GDPR's restrictions on solely automated decision-making apply mainly to healthcare services, and the rights of patients and research participants may significantly differ. The proposed AI Act introduced a risk-based approach to AI systems based on the principles of ethical AI. We analysed the complex connection between the GDPR and AI Act, highlighting the main issues and finding ways to harmonise the principles of data protection and ethical AI. The proposed AI Act may complement the GDPR in healthcare services and medical research. Although several years may pass before the AI Act comes into force, many of its goals will be realised before that.

摘要

尽管人工智能(AI)和自动化决策在医疗服务和医学研究领域有着光明的前景,但其应用仍面临一些法律和伦理障碍。欧盟(EU)正在利用现有法律框架应对这些问题,并起草新的法规,如拟议的《人工智能法案》。欧盟的《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)部分规范了人工智能系统,对处理个人数据以及保护数据主体免受仅基于自动化的决策影响制定了规则。在医疗服务中,(自动化)决策的做出更为频繁和迅速。然而,医学研究侧重于创新和疗效,对个体的直接决策较少。因此,GDPR对仅基于自动化的决策的限制主要适用于医疗服务,患者和研究参与者的权利可能存在显著差异。拟议的《人工智能法案》基于合乎伦理的人工智能原则,引入了一种针对人工智能系统的基于风险的方法。我们分析了GDPR与《人工智能法案》之间的复杂联系,突出了主要问题,并找到了协调数据保护原则与合乎伦理的人工智能原则的方法。拟议的《人工智能法案》可能会在医疗服务和医学研究中补充GDPR。尽管《人工智能法案》可能需要数年时间才能生效,但其许多目标在此之前就会实现。

相似文献

5
The EU Artificial Intelligence Act (2024): Implications for healthcare.欧盟人工智能法案(2024):对医疗保健的影响。
Health Policy. 2024 Nov;149:105152. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105152. Epub 2024 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

2
Advancements in materiovigilance: A comprehensive overview.药物警戒的进展:全面概述。
Perspect Clin Res. 2025 Jul-Sep;16(3):111-117. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_66_24. Epub 2025 May 28.

本文引用的文献

10
Deep learning.深度学习。
Nature. 2015 May 28;521(7553):436-44. doi: 10.1038/nature14539.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验