• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲社会倾向改变网络动态,促进合作。

Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, United States.

Department of Sociology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208, United States.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 23;7(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x
PMID:28336925
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5427964/
Abstract

Dynamic networks have been shown to increase cooperation, but prior findings are compatible with two different mechanisms for the evolution of cooperation. It may be that dynamic networks promote cooperation even in networks composed entirely of egoists, who strategically cooperate to attract and maintain profitable interaction partners. Alternatively, drawing on recent insights into heterogeneous social preferences, we expect that dynamic networks will increase cooperation only when nodes are occupied by persons with more prosocial preferences, who tend to attract and keep more cooperative partners relative to egoists. Our experiment used a standard procedure to classify participants a priori as egoistic or prosocial and then embedded them in homogeneous networks of all prosocials or all egoists, or in heterogeneous networks (50/50). Participants then interacted in repeated prisoner's dilemma games with alters in both static and dynamic networks. In both heterogeneous and homogeneous networks, we find dynamic networks only promote cooperation among prosocials. Resulting from their greater cooperation, prosocials' relations are more stable, yielding substantially higher fitness compared to egoists in both heterogeneous and homogeneous dynamic networks. Our results suggest that a key to the evolution and stability of cooperation is the ability of those with prosocial preferences to alter their networks.

摘要

动态网络已被证明可以增加合作,但先前的研究结果与合作进化的两种不同机制相兼容。可能是动态网络即使在完全由利己主义者组成的网络中也能促进合作,因为利己主义者会从策略上合作,以吸引和维持有利可图的互动伙伴。或者,借鉴最近对异质社会偏好的研究结果,我们预计只有当节点被具有更多亲社会偏好的人占据时,动态网络才会增加合作,因为这些人相对于利己主义者更倾向于吸引和留住更多的合作者。我们的实验使用标准程序将参与者先验地归类为利己主义者或亲社会者,然后将他们嵌入全是亲社会者或全是利己主义者的同质网络中,或嵌入异质网络(50/50)中。然后,参与者与静态和动态网络中的不同参与者进行重复囚徒困境博弈。在异质和同质网络中,我们发现动态网络仅促进亲社会者之间的合作。由于他们的合作程度更高,亲社会者的关系更加稳定,与异质和同质动态网络中的利己主义者相比,他们的适应性更高。我们的结果表明,合作的进化和稳定性的关键是具有亲社会偏好的人改变他们的网络的能力。

相似文献

1
Prosocial Orientation Alters Network Dynamics and Fosters Cooperation.亲社会倾向改变网络动态,促进合作。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 23;7(1):357. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00265-x.
2
Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks.动态网络中的合作、聚类和选择性混合。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 30;115(5):951-956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715357115. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
3
Establishing cooperation in a mixed-motive social dilemma. An fMRI study investigating the role of social value orientation and dispositional trust.在混合动机社会困境中建立合作关系。一项 fMRI 研究探讨社会价值取向和性格信任的作用。
Soc Neurosci. 2014 Feb;9(1):10-22. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.858080. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
4
Relational diversity promotes cooperation in prisoner's dilemma games.关系多样性促进囚徒困境博弈中的合作。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 4;9(12):e114464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114464. eCollection 2014.
5
Social goods dilemmas in heterogeneous societies.异质社会中的社会商品困境。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Aug;4(8):819-831. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0881-2. Epub 2020 May 25.
6
Oxytocin and the Punitive Hub-Dynamic Spread of Cooperation in Human Social Networks.催产素与人类社交网络中惩罚性枢纽-动态合作的扩展。
J Neurosci. 2022 Jul 27;42(30):5930-5943. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2303-21.2022. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
7
Persistent cooperation and gender differences in repeated Prisoner's Dilemma games: Some things never change.重复囚徒困境博弈中的持续合作与性别差异:有些东西从未改变。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jun;187:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.014. Epub 2018 May 2.
8
The influence of cooperation and defection on social decision making in depression: A study of the iterated Prisoner's Dilemma Game.合作与背叛对抑郁症患者社会决策的影响:重复囚徒困境博弈研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Dec 30;246:512-519. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
9
Cooperation dynamics of prisoner's dilemma games on an evolutionary weighted network with heterogeneous preferences.具有异质偏好的进化加权网络上囚徒困境博弈的合作动力学。
Chaos. 2024 Aug 1;34(8). doi: 10.1063/5.0224176.
10
Sparse cliques trump scale-free networks in coordination and competition.稀疏聚类在协调和竞争中胜过无标度网络。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 22;6:21870. doi: 10.1038/srep21870.

引用本文的文献

1
Cooperation is not rewarded by friendship, but generous and selfish students repel each other in social networks.合作并不会因友谊而得到回报,但是在社交网络中,慷慨的学生和自私的学生会相互排斥。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0326564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326564. eCollection 2025.
2
Does similarity trigger cooperation? Dyadic effect of similarity in social value orientation and cognitive resources on cooperation.相似性会引发合作吗?社会价值取向和认知资源的相似性对合作的二元效应。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Jun 6:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03276-8.
3
Factors of influence in prisoner's dilemma task: a review of medical literature.

本文引用的文献

1
Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks.实验社会网络中的财富不平等和可见性。
Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):426-9. doi: 10.1038/nature15392. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
2
Partner Choice Drives the Evolution of Cooperation via Indirect Reciprocity.伙伴选择通过间接互惠推动合作的进化。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 9;10(6):e0129442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129442. eCollection 2015.
3
Quality versus quantity of social ties in experimental cooperative networks.实验合作网络中社会关系的质量与数量。
囚徒困境任务中的影响因素:医学文献综述
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 28;10:e12829. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12829. eCollection 2022.
4
The strength of dynamic ties: The ability to alter some ties promotes cooperation in those that cannot be altered.动态联系的强度:改变某些联系的能力促进了无法改变的联系中的合作。
Sci Adv. 2018 Dec 5;4(12):eaau9109. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau9109. eCollection 2018 Dec.
5
Cooperation, clustering, and assortative mixing in dynamic networks.动态网络中的合作、聚类和选择性混合。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 30;115(5):951-956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715357115. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2814. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3814.
4
Human cooperation.人类合作。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Aug;17(8):413-25. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.003. Epub 2013 Jul 13.
5
Cooperation and assortativity with dynamic partner updating.合作和动态伙伴更新的关联。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 4;109(36):14363-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120867109. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
6
The virtues of gossip: reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior.八卦的美德:作为亲社会行为的声誉信息共享。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 May;102(5):1015-30. doi: 10.1037/a0026650. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.动态社交网络促进了人类实验中的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19193-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108243108. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
8
Co-evolution of behaviour and social network structure promotes human cooperation.行为和社会网络结构的共同进化促进了人类的合作。
Ecol Lett. 2011 Jun;14(6):546-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01615.x. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
9
Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model.社会困境中的社会价值取向与合作:综述与概念模型
Br J Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;47(Pt 3):453-80. doi: 10.1348/014466607X244970. Epub 2007 Oct 3.
10
Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking.具有动态链接的复杂网络中策略与结构的协同进化。
Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Dec 22;97(25):258103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.258103. Epub 2006 Dec 19.