Shang Qian, Pei Guanxiong, Dai Shenyi, Wang Xiaoyi
Management School, Hangzhou Dianzi University Hangzhou, China.
School of Management, Zhejiang University Hangzhou, China.
Front Neurosci. 2017 Mar 8;11:113. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00113. eCollection 2017.
Brand extension typically has two strategies: brand name extension (BN) and brand logo extension (BL). The current study explored which strategy (BN or BL) better enhanced the success of dissimilar brand extension and product promotion in enterprises. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to investigate electrophysiological processes when subjects evaluated their acceptance of the brand extension using a combined picture of S1 and S2. S1 was a famous brand presented by two identity signs (brand name and brand logo). S2 was a picture of an extension product that belonged to a dissimilar product category than S1. The behavior data showed that BL was more acceptable than BN in the dissimilar brand extension. The neurophysiology process was reflected by a less negative N2 component and a larger P300 component in the BL than in the BN. We suggested that N2 reflected a whole conflict between the brand-product combination and the long-term memory and that P300 could be regarded as the reflection of the categorization process in the working memory.
品牌名称延伸(BN)和品牌标志延伸(BL)。本研究探讨了哪种策略(BN或BL)能更好地提升企业中不同品牌延伸和产品推广的成功率。当受试者使用S1和S2的组合图片评估他们对品牌延伸的接受程度时,采用事件相关电位(ERP)来研究电生理过程。S1是由两个标识符号(品牌名称和品牌标志)呈现的著名品牌。S2是一个延伸产品的图片,该产品属于与S1不同的产品类别。行为数据表明,在不同品牌延伸中,BL比BN更易被接受。神经生理过程表现为,与BN相比,BL中N2成分的负性较小,P300成分较大。我们认为,N2反映了品牌 - 产品组合与长期记忆之间的整体冲突,而P300可被视为工作记忆中分类过程的反映。