Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Nov 1;12(10):1370-1377. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0584. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
To investigate the effects of different bout durations on internal and external loads of young soccer players during different small-sided games (SSGs).
Fifteen young male soccer players (average age 17 ± 1 y) participated in 2 vs 2, 3 vs 3, and 4 vs 4 SSGs. All games lasted 12 min playing time in total, but each SSG format further consisted of 4 bout durations: continuous (CON: 1 bout × 12 min) or interval with short (SBD: 6 bouts × 2 min), medium (MBD: 3 bouts × 4 min), or long (LBD: 2 bouts × 6 min) bout durations. During the SSGs, heart-rate (HR) responses and distance covered in different speed zones (walking and low-intensity, moderate-intensity, and high-intensity running) were measured. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and blood lactate (La) were determined at the end of each SSG.
The SBD format elicited significantly lower %HR responses compared to LBD and CON in all formats (P < .05). The SBD format also showed significantly shorter distances covered in walking and greater distances covered in moderate-intensity running, as well as significantly greater total distance covered compared to LBD and CON in all formats (P < .05). In addition, LBD produced significantly lower La and RPE responses than SBD and CON in all formats (P < .05).
These results suggest that coaches and sport scientists who want to achieve higher internal loads could use SBD and CON timing protocols, while those who want to achieve higher external loads might prefer to use SBD and MBD when planning all SSG formats.
研究不同小场地比赛(SSG)中不同回合持续时间对年轻足球运动员内部和外部负荷的影响。
15 名年轻男性足球运动员(平均年龄 17±1 岁)参加了 2 对 2、3 对 3 和 4 对 4 的 SSG。所有比赛的总时长为 12 分钟,但每个 SSG 格式进一步分为 4 个回合持续时间:连续(CON:1 个回合×12 分钟)或间隔短(SBD:6 个回合×2 分钟)、中(MBD:3 个回合×4 分钟)或长(LBD:2 个回合×6 分钟)回合持续时间。在 SSG 期间,测量了心率(HR)反应和不同速度区(步行和低强度、中等强度和高强度跑步)的距离。在每个 SSG 结束时,确定了感觉用力程度(RPE)和血乳酸(La)。
在所有格式中,SBD 格式的 %HR 反应明显低于 LBD 和 CON(P<.05)。SBD 格式还显示步行距离明显缩短,中等强度跑步距离明显增加,以及与 LBD 和 CON 相比,所有格式的总距离明显增加(P<.05)。此外,在所有格式中,LBD 产生的 La 和 RPE 反应明显低于 SBD 和 CON(P<.05)。
这些结果表明,想要达到更高内部负荷的教练和运动科学家可以使用 SBD 和 CON 计时方案,而那些想要达到更高外部负荷的教练和运动科学家在规划所有 SSG 格式时可能更喜欢使用 SBD 和 MBD。