Suppr超能文献

三人制足球比赛中不同回合间恢复时长对青少年足球运动员生理反应及技术活动的影响

Effect of different recovery durations between bouts in 3-a-side games on youth soccer players' physiological responses and technical activities.

作者信息

Köklü Y, Alemdaroğlu U, Dellal A, Wong D P

机构信息

Pamukkale University, School of Sport Sciences, Denizli, Turkey -

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2015 May;55(5):430-8. Epub 2015 Feb 20.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the length of recovery durations between bouts in 4x4min 3-a-side small-sided games (SSG) on time-motion analysis, technical actions and physiological responses of players.

METHODS

Twelve young soccer players participated in 4 different 3-a-side games in which the recovery durations between bouts were different (R1: 1 min, R2: 2 min, R3: 3 min, and R4: 4 min). Heart rate (HR), total distance covered in different speed zones, and technical performance were monitored during all SSGs, whereas the rating of perceived exertion (RPE, CR-10) and venous blood lactate were determined at the end of the last bout of each SSG.

RESULTS

Results showed that SSGs-R1 induced higher %HRreserve and lower successful passes (vs. R3 and R4 conditions, P<0.05), lower total passes (vs. R4 conditions, P<0.05), and greater distance covered in walking zone (0-6.9 km.h⁻¹) (vs. other 3 conditions, P<0.05). In addition, during the SSG-R3 players covered greater distances in high-intensity running zone (>18 km.h-1), performed more tackles (vs. R1 condition, P<0.05) and had more ball contacts (vs. R1 and R2 conditions, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

According to these results, it is thought that R1 and R2 are suitable for inducing higher physiological responses, while R3 and R4 are more appropriate for training aim to improve technical skills in 4x4min 3-a-side SSGs among young soccer players. These findings provide evidence for coaches to justify the selection of recovery duration between bouts in 3-a-side SSGs among young soccer players.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨4对4分钟三人制小型比赛(SSG)中各回合间恢复时长对运动员时间运动分析、技术动作及生理反应的影响。

方法

12名年轻足球运动员参与4种不同的三人制比赛,各回合间的恢复时长不同(R1:1分钟,R2:2分钟,R3:3分钟,R4:4分钟)。在所有小型比赛期间监测心率(HR)、不同速度区域的总跑动距离和技术表现,而在每个小型比赛最后一回合结束时测定主观用力程度评分(RPE,CR-10)和静脉血乳酸水平。

结果

结果显示,与R3和R4组相比,SSG-R1组的心率储备百分比更高,成功传球次数更低(P<0.05);与R4组相比,总传球次数更低(P<0.05);在步行区域(0-6.9公里·小时⁻¹)的跑动距离更远(与其他3组相比,P<0.05)。此外,在SSG-R3期间,运动员在高强度跑步区域(>18公里·小时⁻¹)的跑动距离更远,铲球次数更多(与R1组相比,P<0.05),控球次数更多(与R1和R2组相比,P<0.05)。

结论

根据这些结果,认为R1和R2适合引发更高的生理反应,而R3和R4更适合旨在提高年轻足球运动员4对4分钟三人制小型比赛技术技能的训练目标。这些发现为教练在年轻足球运动员三人制小型比赛中选择各回合间恢复时长提供了依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验