Chang Eva, Cohen Julia, Koethe Benjamin, Smith Kevin, Bir Anupa
RTI International, 307 Waverly Oaks Road, Suite 101, Waltham, MA 02452, USA.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Apr 1;29(2):262-268. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx012.
To validate the Satisfaction of Employees in Health Care (SEHC) survey with multidisciplinary, healthcare staff in the United States (U.S.).
A cross-sectional psychometric study using confirmatory factor analysis. The original three-factor model was tested and modified using half-samples. Models were assessed using goodness-of-fit measures. Scale reliability and validity were tested with Cronbach's α coefficient and correlation of total SEHC score with two global satisfaction items, respectively.
We administered a web-based survey from January to May 2015 to healthcare staff participating in initiatives aimed at delivering better care and reducing costs.
The overall response rate was 38% (N = 1089), and respondents were from 86 healthcare projects. A total of 928 respondents completed the SEHC survey in full and were used in this study.
Model fit of 18 SEHC items and total SEHC score.
The mean SEHC score was 77.6 (SD: 19.0). A one-factor model of job satisfaction had high loadings on all items, and demonstrated adequate model fit (second half-sample RMSEA: 0.069). The scale demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.942) and validity (r = 0.77 and 0.76, both P < 0.05).
The SEHC appears to measure a single general job satisfaction construct. The scale has adequate reliability and validity to recommend its use to assess satisfaction among multidisciplinary, U.S. healthcare staff. Our findings suggest that this survey is a good candidate for reduction to a short-form, and future research should validate this survey in other healthcare populations.
在美国对医疗保健领域多学科医护人员验证《医疗保健员工满意度调查》(SEHC)。
采用验证性因素分析的横断面心理测量研究。使用半样本对原始三因素模型进行测试和修改。使用拟合优度指标评估模型。分别用克朗巴哈α系数以及SEHC总分与两个总体满意度项目的相关性来测试量表的信度和效度。
2015年1月至5月,我们对参与旨在提供更好护理和降低成本举措的医护人员进行了一项基于网络的调查。
总体回复率为38%(N = 1089),受访者来自86个医疗保健项目。共有928名受访者完整完成了SEHC调查,并用于本研究。
18个SEHC项目的模型拟合度和SEHC总分。
SEHC平均得分为77.6(标准差:19.0)。工作满意度单因素模型在所有项目上均有高负荷,并显示出足够的模型拟合度(后半样本RMSEA:0.069)。该量表显示出高信度(克朗巴哈α系数 = 0.942)和效度(r = 0.77和0.76,均P < 0.05)。
SEHC似乎测量的是单一的总体工作满意度结构。该量表具有足够的信度和效度,推荐用于评估美国多学科医护人员的满意度。我们的研究结果表明,该调查很适合简化为简版,未来的研究应在其他医疗保健人群中验证该调查。