• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期护理越来越集中在生命的最后几年:这是 2000 年至 2011 年的变化。

Long-term care is increasingly concentrated in the last years of life: a change from 2000 to 2011.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences and Gerontology Research Center (GEREC), University of Tampere, Finland.

Institute for Advanced Social Research, University of Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):665-669. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw260.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckw260
PMID:28339763
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of long-term care (LTC) is common in very old age and in the last years of life. It is not known how the use pattern is changing as death is being postponed to increasingly old age. The aim is to analyze the association between the use of LTC and approaching death among old people and the change in this association from 2000 to 2011.

METHODS

The data were derived from national registers. The study population consists of 315 458 case-control pairs. Cases (decedents) were those who died between 2000 and 2011 at the age of 70 years or over in Finland. The matched controls (survivors) lived at least 2 years longer. Use of LTC was studied for the last 730 days for decedents and for the same calendar days for survivors. Conditional logistic regression analyses were performed to test the association of LTC use with decedent status and year.

RESULTS

The difference in LTC use between decedents and survivors was smallest among the oldest (OR 9.91 among youngest, 4.96 among oldest). The difference widened from 2000 to 2011 (OR of interaction of LTC use and year increased): use increased or held steady among decedents, but decreased among survivors.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of LTC became increasingly concentrated in the last years of life during the study period. The use of LTC is also common among the oldest survivors. As more people live to very old age, the demand for LTC will increase.

摘要

背景

长期护理(LTC)在非常高龄和生命的最后几年中很常见。目前尚不清楚随着死亡时间的推迟到越来越高龄,使用模式如何变化。目的是分析老年人中使用 LTC 与接近死亡之间的关联,以及这种关联从 2000 年到 2011 年的变化。

方法

数据来自国家登记处。研究人群由 315458 例病例对照对组成。病例(死者)是指 2000 年至 2011 年期间在芬兰年满 70 岁以上死亡的人。匹配的对照(幸存者)至少多活 2 年。对于死者,研究了最后 730 天的 LTC 使用情况,对于幸存者,则研究了相同的日历天数的 LTC 使用情况。使用条件逻辑回归分析来检验 LTC 使用与死者状态和年份的关联。

结果

死者和幸存者之间 LTC 使用的差异在最年长的人群中最小(最年轻者的 OR 为 9.91,最年长者的 OR 为 4.96)。这种差异从 2000 年到 2011 年扩大(LTC 使用和年份的交互作用的 OR 增加):死者中 LTC 的使用增加或保持稳定,但幸存者中则减少。

结论

在研究期间,LTC 的使用在生命的最后几年中变得越来越集中。LTC 的使用在最年长的幸存者中也很常见。随着越来越多的人活到非常高龄,对 LTC 的需求将会增加。

相似文献

1
Long-term care is increasingly concentrated in the last years of life: a change from 2000 to 2011.长期护理越来越集中在生命的最后几年:这是 2000 年至 2011 年的变化。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):665-669. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw260.
2
Trends in the use and costs of round-the-clock long-term care in the last two years of life among old people between 2002 and 2013 in Finland.2002年至2013年芬兰老年人生命最后两年全天候长期护理的使用情况及费用趋势。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 19;17(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2615-3.
3
Changes in older people's care profiles during the last 2 years of life, 1996-1998 and 2011-2013: a retrospective nationwide study in Finland.1996 - 1998年和2011 - 2013年老年人生命最后两年护理状况的变化:芬兰一项全国性回顾性研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 1;7(11):e015130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015130.
4
Long-term care use among old people in their last 2 years of life: variations across Finland.老年人生命最后两年的长期护理使用情况:芬兰各地的差异
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 Jul;24(4):439-49. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12224. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
5
Time-varying effects of socio-demographic and economic factors on the use of institutional long-term care before dementia-related death: A Finnish register-based study.社会人口学和经济因素对痴呆相关死亡前使用机构长期护理的时变影响:一项芬兰基于登记的研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199551. eCollection 2018.
6
Place of living at end-of-life according to cause of death: a comparative analysis of all decedents 70 years or older in 2009-2013 in Finland and Norway.根据死亡原因确定的终末期居住地点:2009-2013 年芬兰和挪威所有 70 岁及以上死者的比较分析。
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 May;13(3):496-512. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-269. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
7
Age and closeness of death as determinants of health and social care utilization: a case-control study.年龄和濒死状态作为健康与社会护理利用的决定因素:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2009 Jun;19(3):313-8. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp028. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
8
Predictors of long-term care among nonagenarians: the Vitality 90 + Study with linked data of the care registers.90 岁以上老年人长期护理的预测因素:活力 90+ 研究与护理登记处的相关数据。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2018 Aug;30(8):913-919. doi: 10.1007/s40520-017-0869-6. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
9
Chronic conditions and multimorbidity in population aged 90 years and over: associations with mortality and long-term care admission.90 岁及以上人群的慢性疾病和多种疾病:与死亡率和长期护理入院的关系。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):564-570. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz019.
10
Long-Term Care Use During the Last 2 Years of Life in Sweden: Implications for Policy to Address Increased Population Aging.瑞典生命最后两年的长期护理使用情况:对应对人口老龄化加剧政策的启示
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jun;21(6):799-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.01.003. Epub 2020 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Change over time in characteristics and survival of residents newly admitted to nursing homes: an analysis of health insurance claims data from 2011 to 2020 in Germany.养老院新入住居民特征及生存情况随时间的变化:对德国2011年至2020年医疗保险理赔数据的分析
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Jul 21;22(1):34. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00871-z.
2
Trends in formal care by age and time to death: the use of healthcare and care-home facilities in Finland between 2005 and 2018.按年龄和死亡时间划分的正规护理趋势:2005年至2018年芬兰医疗保健和养老院设施的使用情况
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;35(3):434-439. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf061.
3
Socioeconomic, health, and social connectedness factors associated with self-rated health of octogenarians and nonagenarians in South Korea: urban and rural comparison.
韩国八旬和九旬老人自评健康状况相关的社会经济、健康及社会联系因素:城乡比较
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3477. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20984-x.
4
Trends in Life Expectancy in Residential Long-Term Care by Sociodemographic Position in 1999-2018: A Multistate Life Table Study of Finnish Older Adults.1999-2018 年按社会人口地位划分的居住长期护理机构中预期寿命的趋势:芬兰老年人多状态生命表研究。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jul 1;79(7). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae067.
5
What about the fundamentals of nursing-its interventions and its continuity among older people in need of home- or facility-based care: a scoping review.对于需要居家或机构护理的老年人而言,护理的基本要素——其干预措施及连续性情况如何:一项范围综述。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jan 22;23(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01675-1.
6
The Impact of the Long-Term Care Insurance on the Medical Expenses and Health Status in China.长期护理保险对中国医疗费用和健康状况的影响。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 6;10:847822. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.847822. eCollection 2022.
7
How can dementia and disability be prevented in older adults: where are we today and where are we going?如何预防老年人的痴呆和残疾:我们今天在哪里,我们要去哪里?
J Intern Med. 2021 Jun;289(6):807-830. doi: 10.1111/joim.13227. Epub 2021 Jan 10.
8
Third follow-up of the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) cohort investigating determinants of cognitive, physical, and psychosocial wellbeing among the oldest old: the CAIDE85+ study protocol.第三轮心血管风险因素、衰老和痴呆(CAIDE)队列研究,旨在调查最年长人群认知、身体和心理社会健康的决定因素:CAIDE85+研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jul 10;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01617-5.
9
Factors associated with institutionalization among home-dwelling patients of Urgent Geriatric Outpatient Clinic: a 3-year follow-up study.老年急诊门诊居家患者机构化相关因素:一项3年随访研究
Eur Geriatr Med. 2020 Oct;11(5):745-751. doi: 10.1007/s41999-020-00338-7. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
10
Structure of self-rated health among the oldest old: Analyses in the total population and those living with dementia.高龄老人自评健康状况的结构:对全体人口及痴呆症患者的分析。
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Mar 18;11:100567. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100567. eCollection 2020 Aug.