Departments of Anesthesiology.
Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Pain Med. 2017 Aug 1;18(8):1582-1592. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx001.
OBJECTIVE: Fibromyalgia is a chronic pain condition with few effective treatments. Many fibromyalgia patients seek acupuncture for analgesia; however, its efficacy is limited and not fully understood. This may be due to heterogeneous pathologies among participants in acupuncture clinical trials. We hypothesized that pressure pain tenderness would differentially classify treatment response to verum and sham acupuncture in fibromyalgia patients. DESIGN: Baseline pressure pain sensitivity at the thumbnail at baseline was used in linear mixed models as a modifier of differential treatment response to sham versus verum acupuncture. Similarly, needle-induced sensation was also analyzed to determine its differential effect of treatment on clinical pain. METHODS AND PATIENTS: A cohort of 114 fibromyalgia patients received baseline pressure pain testing and were randomized to either verum (N = 59) or sham (N = 55) acupuncture. Participants received treatments from once a week to three times a week, increasing in three-week blocks for a total of 18 treatments. Clinical pain was measured on a 101-point visual analog scale, and needle sensation was measured by questionnaire throughout the trial. RESULTS: Participants who had higher pain pressure thresholds had greater reduction in clinical pain following verum acupuncture while participants who had lower pain pressure thresholds showed better analgesic response to sham acupuncture. Moreover, patients with lower pressure pain thresholds had exacerbated clinical pain following verum acupuncture. Similar relationships were observed for sensitivity to acupuncture needling. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that acupuncture efficacy in fibromyalgia may be underestimated and a more personalized treatment for fibromyalgia may also be possible.
目的:纤维肌痛是一种慢性疼痛疾病,目前治疗方法有限。许多纤维肌痛患者寻求针刺治疗来缓解疼痛;然而,其疗效有限,且尚未完全阐明。这可能是由于针刺临床试验参与者的病理情况存在异质性。我们假设压痛阈值会差异分类纤维肌痛患者对真针刺和假针刺的治疗反应。
设计:在基线时,拇指的基础压痛敏感性用于线性混合模型中,作为区分假针刺和真针刺治疗反应的修饰因子。同样,也分析了针感,以确定其对临床疼痛治疗的差异影响。
方法和患者:114 名纤维肌痛患者接受基线压痛测试,并随机分为真针刺组(N=59)和假针刺组(N=55)。参与者每周接受一次到三次治疗,每三周增加一次,共接受 18 次治疗。临床疼痛采用 101 点视觉模拟评分进行测量,整个试验过程中通过问卷测量针感。
结果:压痛阈值较高的参与者在接受真针刺后临床疼痛减轻程度更大,而压痛阈值较低的参与者对假针刺的镇痛反应更好。此外,压痛阈值较低的患者在接受真针刺后临床疼痛加剧。针刺针感也观察到类似的关系。
结论:这些发现表明,纤维肌痛的针刺疗效可能被低估,也可能为纤维肌痛提供更个性化的治疗。
Ann Intern Med. 2005-7-5
Psychoradiology. 2025-4-4
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015
J Tradit Chin Med. 2014-8
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2013-7-27
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-5-31
Arch Intern Med. 2012-10-22
Expert Rev Neurother. 2012-5