Suppr超能文献

研究人员参与社区参与式传播与实施研究的准备情况:核心能力的概念框架

Researcher readiness for participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation research: a conceptual framework of core competencies.

作者信息

Shea Christopher M, Young Tiffany L, Powell Byron J, Rohweder Catherine, Enga Zoe K, Scott Jennifer E, Carter-Edwards Lori, Corbie-Smith Giselle

机构信息

North Carolina Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Department of Health Policy and Management, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, CB#7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA.

出版信息

Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):393-404. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0486-0.

Abstract

Participating in community-engaged dissemination and implementation (CEDI) research is challenging for a variety of reasons. Currently, there is not specific guidance or a tool available for researchers to assess their readiness to conduct CEDI research. We propose a conceptual framework that identifies detailed competencies for researchers participating in CEDI and maps these competencies to domains. The framework is a necessary step toward developing a CEDI research readiness survey that measures a researcher's attitudes, willingness, and self-reported ability for acquiring the knowledge and performing the behaviors necessary for effective community engagement. The conceptual framework for CEDI competencies was developed by a team of eight faculty and staff affiliated with a university's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA). The authors developed CEDI competencies by identifying the attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors necessary for carrying out commonly accepted CE principles. After collectively developing an initial list of competencies, team members individually mapped each competency to a single domain that provided the best fit. Following the individual mapping, the group held two sessions in which the sorting preferences were shared and discrepancies were discussed until consensus was reached. During this discussion, modifications to wording of competencies and domains were made as needed. The team then engaged five community stakeholders to review and modify the competencies and domains. The CEDI framework consists of 40 competencies organized into nine domains: perceived value of CE in D&I research, introspection and openness, knowledge of community characteristics, appreciation for stakeholder's experience with and attitudes toward research, preparing the partnership for collaborative decision-making, collaborative planning for the research design and goals, communication effectiveness, equitable distribution of resources and credit, and sustaining the partnership. Delineation of CEDI competencies advances the broader CE principles and D&I research goals found in the literature and facilitates development of readiness assessments tied to specific training resources for researchers interested in conducting CEDI research.

摘要

由于多种原因,参与社区参与式传播与实施(CEDI)研究具有挑战性。目前,没有具体的指导意见或工具可供研究人员评估他们开展CEDI研究的准备情况。我们提出了一个概念框架,该框架确定了参与CEDI研究的研究人员的详细能力,并将这些能力映射到各个领域。该框架是朝着开发CEDI研究准备情况调查迈出的必要一步,该调查可衡量研究人员获取有效社区参与所需知识和执行相关行为的态度、意愿和自我报告能力。CEDI能力的概念框架由一所大学临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)的八名教职员工组成的团队开发。作者通过确定实施普遍接受的社区参与(CE)原则所需的态度、知识和行为来制定CEDI能力。在共同制定能力的初始清单后,团队成员分别将每个能力映射到最适合的单个领域。在个人映射之后,小组举行了两次会议,分享分类偏好并讨论差异,直到达成共识。在这次讨论中,根据需要对能力和领域的措辞进行了修改。然后,该团队邀请了五名社区利益相关者审查和修改能力及领域。CEDI框架由40项能力组成,分为九个领域:CE在传播与实施(D&I)研究中的感知价值、内省与开放性、社区特征知识、对利益相关者研究经验和态度的理解、为合作决策准备伙伴关系、研究设计和目标的合作规划、沟通有效性、资源和荣誉的公平分配以及维持伙伴关系。CEDI能力的界定推进了文献中更广泛的CE原则和D&I研究目标,并有助于为有兴趣开展CEDI研究的研究人员开发与特定培训资源相关的准备情况评估。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Using Participatory Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity.利用参与式实施科学促进健康公平。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):47-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060722-024251. Epub 2024 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

6

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验