Suppr超能文献

规范大麻制造:借鉴烟草控制的公共卫生最佳实践

Regulating Cannabis Manufacturing: Applying Public Health Best Practices from Tobacco Control.

机构信息

a Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , UA.

b Professor of Medicine, Truth Initiative Distingished Professor of Tobacco Control, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and Department of Medicine , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.

出版信息

J Psychoactive Drugs. 2018 Jan-Mar;50(1):19-32. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1422816. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

Abstract

State legalization and regulation of cannabis, despite continued federal illegality, is a massive shift in regulatory approach. Manufactured cannabis, including concentrates, extracts, edibles, tinctures, topicals and other products, has received less attention than more commonly used dried flower, but represents emerging regulatory challenges due to additives, potency, consumption methods, and abuse and misuse potential. In November 2017, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) released initial cannabis manufacturing regulations as part of a new state regulatory structure. As the largest U.S. medical cannabis market (and largest legal adult use market in the world beginning in 2018), California's regulatory approach will potentially influence national and global policy. Comparing CDPH's initial regulations to tobacco control best practices reveals that, while the regulations recognize the need to protect public health, prioritizing public health over business interests requires stronger approaches to labeling, packaging, and product formulations. Based on tobacco best practices, we recommend that cannabis regulations incorporate large and proportionately sized informational labels, a prominent universal cannabis symbol, rotating and pictorial health warnings, mandatory plain packaging, a comprehensive ban on characterizing flavors and addictive additives, and strict limits on the potency of inhalable products and those easily confused with non-cannabis products.

摘要

尽管联邦政府仍然将大麻视为非法,但州政府对大麻的合法化和监管的转变是巨大的。与更常用的干花相比,包括浓缩物、提取物、可食用产品、酊剂、外用药膏和其他产品在内的大麻制品受到的关注较少,但由于添加剂、效力、消费方式以及滥用和误用的潜在风险,它们代表了新出现的监管挑战。2017 年 11 月,加利福尼亚州公共卫生部(CDPH)发布了大麻制造的初步监管规定,作为新的州监管结构的一部分。作为美国最大的医用大麻市场(并且从 2018 年开始成为全球最大的合法成人使用市场),加利福尼亚州的监管方法可能会影响国家和全球政策。将 CDPH 的初步法规与烟草控制最佳实践进行比较后发现,虽然这些法规认识到需要保护公共健康,但优先考虑公共健康而不是商业利益,需要采用更强有力的标签、包装和产品配方方法。基于烟草最佳实践,我们建议大麻法规应纳入大型且比例适当的信息标签、突出的通用大麻符号、轮换和图像健康警告、强制性的普通包装、全面禁止有吸引力的口味和成瘾性添加剂、以及对可吸入产品和那些容易与非大麻产品混淆的产品的效力进行严格限制。

相似文献

2
How four U.S. states are regulating recreational marijuana edibles.美国四个州如何监管娱乐用大麻食品。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
8
Cannabis Policy in the United States: Implications for Public Health.美国的大麻政策:对公共卫生的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021 Nov 28;2021(58):39-52. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab016.
9
The case for the plain packaging of tobacco products.烟草制品平装的理由。
Addiction. 2008 Apr;103(4):580-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02145.x.

引用本文的文献

3
A systematic review of cannabis health warning research.大麻健康警示研究的系统评价。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Dec 23;37:102573. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102573. eCollection 2024 Jan.
8
Perceptions of U.S. and Canadian Cannabis Package Warnings Among U.S. Adults.美国成年人对美国和加拿大大麻包装警示语的看法。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108275. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108275. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
The importance of psychology for shaping legal cannabis regulation.心理学对于塑造合法大麻监管的重要性。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):99-115. doi: 10.1037/pha0000362. Epub 2020 May 21.

本文引用的文献

2
Toxicant Formation in Dabbing: The Terpene Story.滴吸法中的毒物形成:萜烯的故事
ACS Omega. 2017 Sep 30;2(9):6112-6117. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.7b01130. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
The Pharmaceuticalization of the Tobacco Industry.烟草行业的制药化。
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Aug 15;167(4):278-280. doi: 10.7326/M17-0759. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
8
Pulmonary toxicity of e-cigarettes.电子烟的肺部毒性。
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2017 Aug 1;313(2):L193-L206. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00071.2017. Epub 2017 May 18.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验