a Postdoctoral Fellow, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education and Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , UA.
b Professor of Medicine, Truth Initiative Distingished Professor of Tobacco Control, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and Department of Medicine , University of California San Francisco , San Francisco , CA , USA.
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2018 Jan-Mar;50(1):19-32. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1422816. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
State legalization and regulation of cannabis, despite continued federal illegality, is a massive shift in regulatory approach. Manufactured cannabis, including concentrates, extracts, edibles, tinctures, topicals and other products, has received less attention than more commonly used dried flower, but represents emerging regulatory challenges due to additives, potency, consumption methods, and abuse and misuse potential. In November 2017, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) released initial cannabis manufacturing regulations as part of a new state regulatory structure. As the largest U.S. medical cannabis market (and largest legal adult use market in the world beginning in 2018), California's regulatory approach will potentially influence national and global policy. Comparing CDPH's initial regulations to tobacco control best practices reveals that, while the regulations recognize the need to protect public health, prioritizing public health over business interests requires stronger approaches to labeling, packaging, and product formulations. Based on tobacco best practices, we recommend that cannabis regulations incorporate large and proportionately sized informational labels, a prominent universal cannabis symbol, rotating and pictorial health warnings, mandatory plain packaging, a comprehensive ban on characterizing flavors and addictive additives, and strict limits on the potency of inhalable products and those easily confused with non-cannabis products.
尽管联邦政府仍然将大麻视为非法,但州政府对大麻的合法化和监管的转变是巨大的。与更常用的干花相比,包括浓缩物、提取物、可食用产品、酊剂、外用药膏和其他产品在内的大麻制品受到的关注较少,但由于添加剂、效力、消费方式以及滥用和误用的潜在风险,它们代表了新出现的监管挑战。2017 年 11 月,加利福尼亚州公共卫生部(CDPH)发布了大麻制造的初步监管规定,作为新的州监管结构的一部分。作为美国最大的医用大麻市场(并且从 2018 年开始成为全球最大的合法成人使用市场),加利福尼亚州的监管方法可能会影响国家和全球政策。将 CDPH 的初步法规与烟草控制最佳实践进行比较后发现,虽然这些法规认识到需要保护公共健康,但优先考虑公共健康而不是商业利益,需要采用更强有力的标签、包装和产品配方方法。基于烟草最佳实践,我们建议大麻法规应纳入大型且比例适当的信息标签、突出的通用大麻符号、轮换和图像健康警告、强制性的普通包装、全面禁止有吸引力的口味和成瘾性添加剂、以及对可吸入产品和那些容易与非大麻产品混淆的产品的效力进行严格限制。