van den Heuvel Anne M J, Haberley Benjamin J, Hoyle David J R, Taylor Nigel A S, Croft Rodney J
Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Australian Centre for Electromagnetic Bioeffects Research, School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 May;117(5):1025-1037. doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3592-2. Epub 2017 Mar 25.
Many researchers have addressed the potential effects of hyperthermia and dehydration on cognition, often revealing contradictory outcomes. A possible reason for this inconsistency is that experiments may have been inadequately designed for such effects. In this study, the impact of hyperthermia, dehydration and their combination on cognition were evaluated in eight young males, after accounting for a range of experimental limitations.
Passive heating and thermal clamping at two mean body temperatures (36.5, 38.5 °C) were performed under three hydration states (euhydrated, 3 and 5% dehydrated) to assess their effects on difficulty-matched working memory and visual perception tasks, and on a difficulty manipulated perceptual task. Data were analysed according to signal detection theory to isolate changes in response sensitivity, bias and speed.
Neither moderate hyperthermia (P = 0.141) nor dehydration (P > 0.604) modified response sensitivity, nor did they significantly interact (P > 0.698). Therefore, the ability to distinguish correct from incorrect responses was unaffected. Nevertheless, hyperthermia, but not dehydration (P = 0.301), reduced the response bias (-0.08 versus 2.2 [normothermia]; P = 0.010) and reaction time (mean reduction 49 ms; P < 0.001), eliciting more liberal and faster responses (P = 0.010). Response bias was reduced for the memory relative to the perceptual task (P = 0.037), and this effect was enhanced during hyperthermia (P = 0.031).
These observations imply that, once potentially confounding influences were controlled, moderate hyperthermia, significant dehydration and their combined effects had insufficient impact to impair cognition within the memory and perceptual domains tested. Nonetheless, moderate hyperthermia elicited more liberal and rapid responses.
许多研究人员探讨了体温过高和脱水对认知的潜在影响,结果往往相互矛盾。这种不一致的一个可能原因是,针对此类影响的实验设计可能不够充分。在本研究中,在考虑了一系列实验限制因素后,评估了体温过高、脱水及其组合对8名年轻男性认知的影响。
在三种水合状态(正常水合、脱水3%和脱水5%)下,通过被动加热和将平均体温维持在两个水平(36.5、38.5°C)进行热钳夹,以评估其对难度匹配的工作记忆和视觉感知任务以及难度可控的感知任务的影响。根据信号检测理论分析数据,以分离反应敏感性、偏差和速度的变化。
中度体温过高(P = 0.141)和脱水(P > 0.604)均未改变反应敏感性,二者之间也未产生显著相互作用(P > 0.698)。因此,区分正确与错误反应的能力未受影响。然而,体温过高会降低反应偏差(-0.08对2.2[正常体温];P = 0.010)和反应时间(平均减少49毫秒;P < 0.001),引发更宽松和更快的反应(P = 0.010),而脱水则无此作用(P = 0.301)。相对于感知任务,记忆任务的反应偏差有所降低(P = 0.037),且在体温过高时这种影响会增强(P = 0.031)。
这些观察结果表明,一旦控制了潜在的混杂影响,中度体温过高、显著脱水及其综合影响对所测试的记忆和感知领域内的认知影响不足,不足以损害认知。尽管如此,中度体温过高会引发更宽松和快速的反应。