Su S S, Lahue R S, Au K G, Modrich P
Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
J Biol Chem. 1988 May 15;263(14):6829-35.
To evaluate the substrate specificity of methyl-directed mismatch repair in Escherichia coli extracts, we have constructed a set of DNA heteroduplexes, each of which contains one of the eight possible single base pair mismatches and a single hemimethylated d(GATC) site. Although all eight mismatches were located at the same position within heteroduplex molecules and were embedded within the same sequence environment, they were not corrected with equal efficiencies in vitro. G-T was corrected most efficiently, with A-C, C-T, A-A, T-T, and G-G being repaired at rates 40-80% of that of the G-T mispair. Correction of each of these six mispairs occurred in a methyl-directed manner in a reaction requiring mutH, mutL, and mutS gene products. C-C and A-G mismatches showed different behavior. C-C was an extremely poor substrate for correction while repair of A-G was anomalous. Although A-G was corrected to A-T by the mutHLS-dependent, methyl-directed pathway, repair of A-G to C-G occurred largely by a pathway that is independent of the methylation state of the heteroduplex and which does not require mutH, mutL, or mutS gene products. Similar results were obtained with a second A-G mismatch in a different sequence environment suggesting that a novel pathway may exist for processing A-G mispairs to C-G base pairs. As judged by DNase I footprint analysis, MutS protein is capable of recognizing each of the eight possible base-base mismatches. Use of this method to estimate the apparent affinity of MutS protein for each of the mispairs revealed a rough correlation between MutS affinity and efficiency of correction by the methyl-directed pathway. However, the A-C mismatch was an exception in this respect indicating that interactions other than mismatch recognition may contribute to the efficiency of repair.
为了评估大肠杆菌提取物中甲基导向错配修复的底物特异性,我们构建了一组DNA异源双链体,每个异源双链体都包含八种可能的单碱基对错配中的一种以及一个单半甲基化的d(GATC)位点。尽管所有八种错配都位于异源双链体分子内的同一位置,并嵌入相同的序列环境中,但它们在体外的校正效率并不相同。G-T错配的校正效率最高,A-C、C-T、A-A、T-T和G-G错配的修复速率为G-T错配的40%-80%。这六种错配中的每一种在需要mutH、mutL和mutS基因产物的反应中均以甲基导向的方式进行校正。C-C和A-G错配表现出不同的行为。C-C是校正的极差底物,而A-G错配的修复则异常。尽管A-G通过依赖mutHLS的甲基导向途径校正为A-T,但A-G到C-G的修复很大程度上是通过一条独立于异源双链体甲基化状态且不需要mutH、mutL或mutS基因产物的途径进行的。在不同序列环境中的第二个A-G错配也得到了类似的结果,这表明可能存在一条将A-G错配加工成C-G碱基对的新途径。通过DNase I足迹分析判断,MutS蛋白能够识别八种可能的碱基错配中的每一种。使用这种方法估计MutS蛋白对每种错配的表观亲和力,发现MutS亲和力与甲基导向途径的校正效率之间存在大致的相关性。然而,A-C错配在这方面是个例外,表明错配识别以外的相互作用可能影响修复效率。