Latacz Paweł, Simka Marian, Brzegowy Paweł, Janas Piotr, Kazibudzki Marek, Pieniążek Piotr, Ochała Andrzej, Popiela Tadeusz, Mrowiecki Tomasz
Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.
Department of Angiology, Private Healthcare Institution SANA Outpatient, Pszczyna, Poland.
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2017;13(1):53-61. doi: 10.5114/aic.2017.66187. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
Although surgical endarterectomy remains the treatment of choice for carotid artery stenosis, stenting plays an important role as an alternative treatment modality, especially in high-risk patients. The actual safety profile associated with stenting procedures is probably better than that reported by randomized controlled trials.
To assess the safety of stent implantations in extracranial arteries supplying the brain, and also to identify risk factors associated with this procedure.
This was a post hoc analysis, with 30-day follow-up. We analyzed the results of treatment of 372 patients who underwent 408 procedures, 197 such procedures in asymptomatic, and 211 in symptomatic individuals. Stenting procedures were performed using a technique and armamentarium which were tailored to the type and anatomy of lesions.
There were 6 (1.5%) strokes, including 2 (0.5%) major strokes, 1 ipsi- and 1 contralateral, and 4 (1.0%) minor strokes. In asymptomatic patients there was 1 (0.3%) minor stroke. Transient ischemic attacks occurred in 5 (1.2%) patients. There were 2 (0.5%) non-STEMI myocardial infarctions and 2 (0.5%) non-stroke related fatalities. Risk factors of these adverse events were diabetes mellitus, lesions localized in a tortuous segment of the artery, embolic material in the filter and bilateral stenoses of carotid arteries. Additional risk factors in asymptomatic patients were renal impairment and advanced coronary artery disease; and in symptomatic patients, grade 3 arterial hypertension, dislipidemia, cigarette smoking and lesions requiring predilatation.
Stenting procedures of extracranial arteries supplying the brain, which are tailored to the type and anatomy of lesions, seem to be relatively safe.
尽管外科动脉内膜切除术仍是治疗颈动脉狭窄的首选方法,但支架置入术作为一种替代治疗方式发挥着重要作用,尤其是在高危患者中。与支架置入手术相关的实际安全性可能优于随机对照试验报告的情况。
评估大脑供血颅外动脉支架植入的安全性,并确定与该手术相关的危险因素。
这是一项有30天随访的事后分析。我们分析了372例患者接受408次手术的治疗结果,其中无症状患者进行了197次此类手术,有症状患者进行了211次。支架置入手术采用根据病变类型和解剖结构量身定制的技术和器械进行。
发生了6例(1.5%)中风,包括2例(0.5%)严重中风,1例同侧和1例对侧,以及4例(1.0%)轻微中风。无症状患者中有1例(0.3%)轻微中风。5例(1.2%)患者发生短暂性脑缺血发作。有2例(0.5%)非ST段抬高型心肌梗死和2例(0.5%)与中风无关的死亡。这些不良事件(发生)的危险因素包括糖尿病、位于动脉迂曲段的病变、滤网中的栓塞物质以及双侧颈动脉狭窄。无症状患者的其他危险因素是肾功能损害和晚期冠状动脉疾病;有症状患者的危险因素是3级动脉高血压、血脂异常、吸烟以及需要预扩张的病变。
根据病变类型和解剖结构量身定制的大脑供血颅外动脉支架置入手术似乎相对安全。