Yan Yucheng, Ramirez Sylvia, Anand Shuchi, Qian Jiaqi, Zuo Li
DaVita Hospital Management Consulting (Shanghai) Co.Ltd., Shanghai, China.
DaVita Healthcare Partners Inc, Singapore.
Semin Dial. 2017 May;30(3):277-281. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12588. Epub 2017 Mar 26.
Cumulative evidence indicates it may be worthwhile revisiting the twice-weekly hemodialysis (HD) regimen as a valid option for individualized or incremental treatments for selected patients with end-stage renal disease. In this article, we will review the current evidences on the potential pros and cons of twice-weekly HD compared to thrice-weekly HD including China's experience in the practice of twice-weekly HD. A prudent patient selection and close dialysis adequacy monitoring might be necessary for this medical treatment choice. More randomized prospective controlled studies for the critical evaluation of twice-weekly dialysis are encouraged.
越来越多的证据表明,对于某些终末期肾病患者,将每周两次的血液透析(HD)方案作为个体化或递增治疗的有效选择可能是值得的。在本文中,我们将回顾与每周三次HD相比,每周两次HD潜在利弊的现有证据,包括中国在每周两次HD实践中的经验。对于这种治疗选择,谨慎选择患者并密切监测透析充分性可能是必要的。鼓励开展更多随机前瞻性对照研究,以对每周两次透析进行批判性评估。